My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06826
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06826
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:24:31 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:53:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8441.600.20
Description
Pleasant Valley Pipeline
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
11/1/2000
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Pleasant Valley Pipeline Draft Environmental Assessment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />PLEASANT V ALLEY PIPELINE <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />The selection of a Proposed Alternative was based on additional analysis of <br />quantitative (economic) and qualitative (non-economic) criteria. Quantitative criteria <br />included pipeline diameter and an equivalent length analysis. There was no substantial <br />quantitative difference between the three alternatives; thus, the selection of a Proposed <br />Alternative was based on qualitative criteria. Ten qualitative criteria were used to <br />evaluate each of the three preliminary alternatives. Qualitative criteria included <br />biological resources, cultural/historic resources, visual impact, proximity to residences, <br />easement acquisition, turnout lengths (for connection to project participants), schedule, <br />permitting, land use impacts, and traffic impacts. The results of this analysis indicated <br />that the Central pipeline alignment would have the lowest overall impact on the <br />environment, traveling public, and private residences, while providing the District with a <br />cost effective and functional pipeline. The Central pipeline alignment was determined to <br />be the environmentally preferable alternative. <br /> <br />The following discussion includes a description of the Proposed Alternative, the No- <br />Action Alternative and a brief discussion of the alternatives that were considered but <br />eliminated. <br /> <br />Proposed Action Alternative - The Central Pipeline Alignment <br />The District's proposed action is to install 8.5 miles of buried raw water pipeline from <br />the Munroe Canal to the Fort Collins Water Treatment Facility and Soldier Canyon Filter <br />Plant, collectively referred to as water treatment plants (WTPs) (Figure I). A turnout to <br />an existing pipeline would deliver water to Greeley's Bellvue Water Treatment Plant. <br />The buried gravity pipeline would have a diameter of 67 inches with a maximum working <br />pressure of 145 psi. The anticipated capacity of the PVPL is 120 million gallons per day. <br /> <br />Pipeline Location and Facilities <br /> <br />A turnout on the Munroe Canal would be constructed to deliver water into the <br />pipeline. Preliminary design indicates a takeoff structure with a controllable side outlet <br />and flow-measuring device would be necessary (CH2M Hill 1999). In addition, the <br />existing Munroe Canal Diversion gate on the Poudre River would need to be motorized to <br />allow remote control operations by Fort Collins and Soldier Canyon water treatment <br />plants to match pipeline flows with plant demands. <br /> <br />A forebay pond would be installed adjacent to the Munroe Canal at the top of the <br />proposed PVPL inlet. The forebay pond is required to provide flow equalization, mitigate <br />sediment transport into the pipeline, and enhance pipeline and canal flexibility and <br />reliability. The pond would be about 6 acres in size and hold about 34 million gallons at <br />capacity. <br /> <br />The proposed pipeline extends south from the forebay outlet across agricultural lands <br />and the Poudre Valley Canal to State Highway 14. The pipeline would bore under State <br />Highway 14 and continue south to the open trench crossing of the Poudre River (Figure <br />I). South of the Poudre River, the pipeline would cross Lewstone Creek and parallel the <br />Charles Hansen Supply Canal and existing Fort Collins buried pipelines to the County <br />Road 54E crossing. The pipeline would then continue southeast along the existing Fort <br />Collins pipeline route and cross County Road 25E and the Lake Canal. Continuing <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.