|
<br />Table Al-4
<br />Enviriormental Q.lal1ty Account
<br />M:E1mo Creek Salinity (bntrol Study, Cblorado
<br />
<br />A. Irrigated Area Treata:! (ae)
<br />
<br />B. Witer ~tity (ac.ft./yr)
<br />1. Diversioo 1/
<br />2. Change in Diversion
<br />3 . I:eli vera:! to Farms
<br />4. Warm I:eep Percolation
<br />5 . Cbnsupti ve Use (Onfarm) 2/
<br />6. <h1sunptive Use (wetland) 2/
<br />7. Reduction in O:>nsumptive Use
<br />8. Return FlCM
<br />9. Warm Irrig. Efficiency
<br />Valleywide Effect
<br />
<br />C. Water QJa1ity
<br />1. Reductioo in Salt Loading (tons) 3/
<br />2. Reduction in Salt Concentrations iii
<br />Imperial Lam (mg/l)
<br />3. Salt Cbncentrations Upstreall fran
<br />Parker ram.
<br />
<br />D. wetlands
<br />1. Area of \oetlands in treatment
<br />area (ac)
<br />2. Impacts
<br />a. Area (ae)
<br />b. Values (IRN) !!!
<br />3 . Avoided Impacts
<br />a. Area (ae)
<br />b. Values (1illV) 4/
<br />4. \oetlands Lost (ac- per 1,000 tens)
<br />
<br />F. His torical and Arcreological
<br />1. Sites listed in National kegister 4/ 5/
<br />2. Aroo avoided (ae) ~ y - -
<br />
<br />MAY 1982
<br />
<br />Alternative Plan Nunber
<br />Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3 Plan 4 Plan 5 Plan 6
<br />
<br />29,100 20,cnJ 21,550 21,050 21,550 28,450
<br />
<br />121,000
<br />o
<br />118,000
<br />10 ,000
<br />54 ,000
<br />
<br />45%
<br />
<br />90,000
<br />37,000
<br />87,000
<br />7,000
<br />54 ,000
<br />
<br /><n"
<br />'^'"
<br />
<br />84 ,000
<br />37,000
<br />84 ,000
<br />7,000
<br />54 ,000
<br />
<br />64"
<br />,.
<br />
<br />85,000
<br />36,000
<br />85,000
<br />7,000
<br />54 ,000
<br />
<br />64%
<br />
<br />85,000 114,000
<br />36,000 7,CIXJ
<br />85,000 114,000
<br />7,000' 10,000
<br />54 ,000 54 ,000
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />>
<br />
<br />64:( 47%
<br />
<br />-<;,000 17,000 1/:1,000 31,000 32,000 21,000
<br />-3.1 0.8 2.1 3.4 3.6 1.1
<br />
<br />11 ,000
<br />
<br />1,850
<br />10,100
<br />
<br />9,165
<br />49,500
<br />
<br />830
<br />
<br />7,900
<br />
<br />1,725
<br />9,420
<br />
<br />6,175
<br />33,300
<br />133
<br />
<br />o
<br />o
<br />
<br />o
<br />8,200
<br />
<br />fQ7
<br />
<br />8,100
<br />
<br />1,75U
<br />9,555
<br />
<br />6,395
<br />34,500
<br />73
<br />
<br />o
<br />7,550
<br />
<br />fQ6
<br />
<br />8,000
<br />
<br />1,725
<br />9,420
<br />
<br />6,230
<br />33,600
<br />47
<br />
<br />o
<br />8,050
<br />
<br />825
<br />
<br />fQ4
<br />
<br />827
<br />
<br />8,100 10,1OJ
<br />
<br />1,750
<br />9,555
<br />
<br />1,800
<br />9,830
<br />
<br />6,395
<br />34,500
<br />46
<br />
<br />8,955
<br />48,300
<br />67
<br />
<br />u
<br />7,550
<br />
<br />o
<br />650
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />1/ Basa:! 00 wlume of ;ater deliverd at the farm to irrigate the 29,100 acres in the valley.
<br />2/ Present consumptive Uge on 29,100 aeres of irrigata:! croplarrl is 47,000 acre-feet per year.
<br />3/ Based 00 28,450 acres of improved irrigated land renaining after program implanentation.
<br />4/ IillV = Habitat Uhits Value after USFS Habitat Evaluation Prooedure (IIEP).
<br />5/ SOOuld sites of archeological value be discovered duri'15 construction, Wlrk wlll be
<br />- stopped to give the State Historic Preservation Offioer t:i.rre to assess the value of the
<br />site and salvage valuable artifaets.
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />C\IG
<br />C,\.;\v .
<br />.;
<br />
|