My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06806
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06806
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:24:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:52:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.450
Description
McElmo Creek Unit - Colorado River Salinity Control Program
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
7
Date
5/1/1982
Title
Possible Improvements for Onfarm Irrigation Systems to Reduce Salinity
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MAY 1982 <br /> <br /> Table Al-3 <br /> Other Social Effects Account 1/ <br /> McE1m:> Creek !alinity QJntrol Study,- Cblorado <br /> Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3 Plan 4 Plan 5 Plan 6 <br /> A. Real Income Distribution <br /> 1. Regional Farm BenefitsY ($) 19.0 423.0 513.8 11l9.4 1329.5 175.9 <br /> 2. Regional Farm FXpens":y ($) 25.5 377.1 585.8 853.0 871.0 496.1 <br /> 3. Distribution by Class <br /> a. Adj. Gross Fann Inc~ <br /> Benefits and Expenses <br /> Under $2,m (%) 29 29 29 29 29 29 <br /> $2,m - $10,000 (%) 36 36 36 36 36 36 <br /> 10,000 - 20,000 (%) 14 14 14 14 14 14 <br /> CWer $20,om (%) 21 21 21. 21 21 21 <br />. <br /> B. Life, a.al th and Safety 'fts/no No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes <br />. 1. S:lgn1ficant reduce salt <br /> cootent in Witer used by more <br /> than 17 1/2 million downstream <br /> residents in Cblorado, Utah <br /> California, Arizona, l>evada <br /> and the Republic of I1!>d.co. <br /> 2. Significant Increase the No No lob Yes Yes No <br /> assesse:l valuation of property <br /> and tax revenues from farms and <br /> faDn relate:l t.Js1ness du: to <br /> the proj ect . <br /> 3. Increased ootput a1d long No No No Yes Yes No <br /> tenn stabilizing influence on <br /> agricultural population and <br /> out-migration. <br /> 4. Installation of irrigation No Yes Yes Yes Yes No <br /> IOOaSures will result in higher <br /> crop yields, and I1Xlre efficient <br /> use of irrigation Witer and I1Xlre <br /> efficient fertilizer use. <br /> 5. Installation will result in No No No Yes Yes No <br /> significant lower costs in labor. <br /> 6. Erergy COIlStIIIption in trillions <br />~ of BlU's. 0.050 0.291 0.711 1.369 1.469 1.022 <br /> <br />1/ Cbst '-'!te aIOrtized at 7 5/8 for 25 years. July 1981 price bsse. Benefits and rosts <br />lieIe canputed in presEnt valu: terms with a 6-year installstion period. Fiscal Year <br />1982 WRC crop prices used. <br />2/ IncrSllents of $1,000 <br />3/ Census of ~r1culture (1978) <br /> <br />~. <br />.4 nl,:.:> <br />r. ~...) <br />~-, . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.