<br />methodologies and concluded that a
<br />combination of approaches may be
<br />required to ensure adequate repre-
<br />sentation of the CRSP customers.
<br />
<br />The meeting concluded with a de-
<br />tailed presentation and discussion
<br />of the recreation economics com-
<br />pleted by HBRS during the initial
<br />phase of the GeES program. The
<br />discussion centered on the interpre-
<br />tation of recreation value and recre-
<br />ational benefits. It was concluded
<br />that during high water years, dam
<br />operations have a limited impact on
<br />benefits, but that the recreation
<br />impact increases in low water years.
<br />
<br />Executive Review
<br />
<br />Committee
<br />
<br />On Thursday, May 4, 1989, the Glen
<br />Canyon Environmental Studies
<br />(GeES) Executive Review Commit-
<br />tee <ERC) met in Las Vegas, Ne-
<br />vada. The purpose of the meeting
<br />was to provide an opportunity for
<br />the ERe to meet Dr. Duncan Pat-
<br />ten, the GeES Senior Scientist, and
<br />provide input in regards to the pol-
<br />icy and management direction of
<br />the GeES Phase II scientific pro-
<br />gram.
<br />
<br />The ERC agenda also focused on an
<br />in-depth discussion of the status of
<br />the GeES Phase II technical stud-
<br />ies and the work planned for fiscal
<br />year 1989. The National Park Ser-
<br />vice raised several issues regarding
<br />the accelerated loss of beaches in
<br />the Grand Canyon as a result of the
<br />reiniation of the fluctuating flows
<br />and the conceOlS expressed by the
<br />environmental constituents.
<br />
<br />An extensive discussion also took
<br />place between the members of the
<br />ERC over the design of the GeES
<br />Phase II teclmical studies and their
<br />relationships to the potential for
<br />NEPA compliance. During the
<br />dialoque, the National Park Service
<br />and the Fish & WIldlife Service ex-
<br />pressed their concerns over the
<br />need for a more defined study pro-
<br />cess with a defmitive route for deci-
<br />sion. All agreed that the decisions
<br />concerning NEPA are important
<br />and that additional review by all
<br />ERC members is required.
<br />
<br />,:::,.
<br />.'.It
<br />
<br />UPCOMING
<br />MEETINGS
<br />
<br />Tempe, Arizona
<br />
<br />. Technical Work Group Meeting
<br />(with Senior Scientist) - June 5,
<br />1989
<br />
<br />Flagstaff, Arizona
<br />
<br />. Environmental Technical Team -
<br />JWle 15, 1989
<br />
<br />. Executive Review Committee -
<br />June 15, 1989 - (An evening
<br />forum discussion with the techni-
<br />cal teams)
<br />
<br />· Economic Technical Team - June
<br />16,1989
<br />
<br />GLEN CANYON
<br />ENVIRONMENTAL
<br />STUDIES PHASE II
<br />PROGRAM
<br />ORGANIZATION
<br />
<br />The Glen Canyon Environmental
<br />Studies (GeES) program is a dy-
<br />namic assemblage of groups and of-
<br />fices organized with the objective of
<br />accomplishing the directives of the
<br />Department of the Interior {Depart-
<br />ment). The GeES program was ini-
<br />tiated in 1982 as a multi-agency
<br />approach with the primary coordi-
<br />nation delegated to the Bureau of
<br />Reclamation (Reclamation), Upper
<br />Colorado Region.
<br />
<br />The purpose of this discussion is to
<br />identify the key organizational com-
<br />ponents of the GeES Phase II pro-
<br />gram, and outline how the program
<br />components are coordinated in the
<br />GeES "Big picture." The GeES is
<br />organized to develop a technically
<br />focused program within the bound-
<br />aries of the Department's direction
<br />and provide the scientific informa-
<br />tion and credibility necessary for
<br />the development of sound manage-
<br />ment decisions.
<br />
<br />This description is separated into
<br />five' sections: Primary Coordina-
<br />tion, Management and Policy Direc-
<br />tion, Technical Input, Scientific
<br />Direction and Review, and Study
<br />Teams and Work Groups. The prin-
<br />ciple components in each of these
<br />
<br />",--,,,,
<br />f:. :j
<br />
<br />sections are outlined on the accom-
<br />panying organizational chart.
<br />
<br />A. Primary Coordination
<br />
<br />In a program as bureaucratically
<br />complex as the GeES, it is impor-
<br />tant that one office handle the pri-
<br />mary coordination and data
<br />organization. The responsibility for
<br />the overall technical and scientific
<br />coordination rests with the GeES
<br />Program Manager, David L. Weg-
<br />ner, and two technical offices, lo-
<br />cated in Flagstaff, Arizona, and Salt
<br />Lake City, Utah. The Flagstaff of-
<br />fice is responsible for the coordina-
<br />tion of the Phase II field studies,
<br />development of the technical re-
<br />ports, and database development.
<br />Nancy Brian and Michael Yard co-
<br />ordinate the field study require-
<br />ments with the responsible offices.
<br />In the Salt Lake City office, Barbara
<br />Taylor is responsible for the GeES
<br />Phase II administrative coordina-
<br />tion, report printing, correspon-
<br />dence, and the public information
<br />transfer program.
<br />
<br />B:-Management and Policy
<br />
<br />Direction
<br />
<br />The principle management and pol-
<br />icy direction of the GeES program
<br />rests with the Executive Review
<br />Committee <ERC) and Reclamation.
<br />Reclamation was given the directive
<br />to coordinate the overall GeES pro-
<br />gram, while policy and manage-
<br />ment direction are provided by the
<br />cooperating bureaus and agencies,
<br />
<br />The ERC provides the primary Fed-
<br />eral policy and management guid-
<br />ance, Representatives of the ERe
<br />include: Reclamation (Upper Colo-
<br />rado Region), National Park Service
<br />(Grand Canyon National Park),
<br />Fish & Wildlife Service (Region 2),
<br />Department of the Interior (Office of
<br />Environmental Project Review),
<br />and Western Area Power Adminis-
<br />tration, Department of Energy.
<br />
<br />In December 1988, Dr. Wayne
<br />Marchant. Reclamation. Denver Of-
<br />fice. was named as the overall coor-
<br />dinator of the GCES program. His
<br />duties include providing overall pol-
<br />icy coordination with the Depart-
<br />ment, directing the ERC,
<br />coordinating with the Colorado
<br />River Basin States (CRBS), and
<br />other major constituent groups, and
<br />
|