Laserfiche WebLink
<br />methodologies and concluded that a <br />combination of approaches may be <br />required to ensure adequate repre- <br />sentation of the CRSP customers. <br /> <br />The meeting concluded with a de- <br />tailed presentation and discussion <br />of the recreation economics com- <br />pleted by HBRS during the initial <br />phase of the GeES program. The <br />discussion centered on the interpre- <br />tation of recreation value and recre- <br />ational benefits. It was concluded <br />that during high water years, dam <br />operations have a limited impact on <br />benefits, but that the recreation <br />impact increases in low water years. <br /> <br />Executive Review <br /> <br />Committee <br /> <br />On Thursday, May 4, 1989, the Glen <br />Canyon Environmental Studies <br />(GeES) Executive Review Commit- <br />tee <ERC) met in Las Vegas, Ne- <br />vada. The purpose of the meeting <br />was to provide an opportunity for <br />the ERe to meet Dr. Duncan Pat- <br />ten, the GeES Senior Scientist, and <br />provide input in regards to the pol- <br />icy and management direction of <br />the GeES Phase II scientific pro- <br />gram. <br /> <br />The ERC agenda also focused on an <br />in-depth discussion of the status of <br />the GeES Phase II technical stud- <br />ies and the work planned for fiscal <br />year 1989. The National Park Ser- <br />vice raised several issues regarding <br />the accelerated loss of beaches in <br />the Grand Canyon as a result of the <br />reiniation of the fluctuating flows <br />and the conceOlS expressed by the <br />environmental constituents. <br /> <br />An extensive discussion also took <br />place between the members of the <br />ERC over the design of the GeES <br />Phase II teclmical studies and their <br />relationships to the potential for <br />NEPA compliance. During the <br />dialoque, the National Park Service <br />and the Fish & WIldlife Service ex- <br />pressed their concerns over the <br />need for a more defined study pro- <br />cess with a defmitive route for deci- <br />sion. All agreed that the decisions <br />concerning NEPA are important <br />and that additional review by all <br />ERC members is required. <br /> <br />,:::,. <br />.'.It <br /> <br />UPCOMING <br />MEETINGS <br /> <br />Tempe, Arizona <br /> <br />. Technical Work Group Meeting <br />(with Senior Scientist) - June 5, <br />1989 <br /> <br />Flagstaff, Arizona <br /> <br />. Environmental Technical Team - <br />JWle 15, 1989 <br /> <br />. Executive Review Committee - <br />June 15, 1989 - (An evening <br />forum discussion with the techni- <br />cal teams) <br /> <br />· Economic Technical Team - June <br />16,1989 <br /> <br />GLEN CANYON <br />ENVIRONMENTAL <br />STUDIES PHASE II <br />PROGRAM <br />ORGANIZATION <br /> <br />The Glen Canyon Environmental <br />Studies (GeES) program is a dy- <br />namic assemblage of groups and of- <br />fices organized with the objective of <br />accomplishing the directives of the <br />Department of the Interior {Depart- <br />ment). The GeES program was ini- <br />tiated in 1982 as a multi-agency <br />approach with the primary coordi- <br />nation delegated to the Bureau of <br />Reclamation (Reclamation), Upper <br />Colorado Region. <br /> <br />The purpose of this discussion is to <br />identify the key organizational com- <br />ponents of the GeES Phase II pro- <br />gram, and outline how the program <br />components are coordinated in the <br />GeES "Big picture." The GeES is <br />organized to develop a technically <br />focused program within the bound- <br />aries of the Department's direction <br />and provide the scientific informa- <br />tion and credibility necessary for <br />the development of sound manage- <br />ment decisions. <br /> <br />This description is separated into <br />five' sections: Primary Coordina- <br />tion, Management and Policy Direc- <br />tion, Technical Input, Scientific <br />Direction and Review, and Study <br />Teams and Work Groups. The prin- <br />ciple components in each of these <br /> <br />",--,,,, <br />f:. :j <br /> <br />sections are outlined on the accom- <br />panying organizational chart. <br /> <br />A. Primary Coordination <br /> <br />In a program as bureaucratically <br />complex as the GeES, it is impor- <br />tant that one office handle the pri- <br />mary coordination and data <br />organization. The responsibility for <br />the overall technical and scientific <br />coordination rests with the GeES <br />Program Manager, David L. Weg- <br />ner, and two technical offices, lo- <br />cated in Flagstaff, Arizona, and Salt <br />Lake City, Utah. The Flagstaff of- <br />fice is responsible for the coordina- <br />tion of the Phase II field studies, <br />development of the technical re- <br />ports, and database development. <br />Nancy Brian and Michael Yard co- <br />ordinate the field study require- <br />ments with the responsible offices. <br />In the Salt Lake City office, Barbara <br />Taylor is responsible for the GeES <br />Phase II administrative coordina- <br />tion, report printing, correspon- <br />dence, and the public information <br />transfer program. <br /> <br />B:-Management and Policy <br /> <br />Direction <br /> <br />The principle management and pol- <br />icy direction of the GeES program <br />rests with the Executive Review <br />Committee <ERC) and Reclamation. <br />Reclamation was given the directive <br />to coordinate the overall GeES pro- <br />gram, while policy and manage- <br />ment direction are provided by the <br />cooperating bureaus and agencies, <br /> <br />The ERC provides the primary Fed- <br />eral policy and management guid- <br />ance, Representatives of the ERe <br />include: Reclamation (Upper Colo- <br />rado Region), National Park Service <br />(Grand Canyon National Park), <br />Fish & Wildlife Service (Region 2), <br />Department of the Interior (Office of <br />Environmental Project Review), <br />and Western Area Power Adminis- <br />tration, Department of Energy. <br /> <br />In December 1988, Dr. Wayne <br />Marchant. Reclamation. Denver Of- <br />fice. was named as the overall coor- <br />dinator of the GCES program. His <br />duties include providing overall pol- <br />icy coordination with the Depart- <br />ment, directing the ERC, <br />coordinating with the Colorado <br />River Basin States (CRBS), and <br />other major constituent groups, and <br />