Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />reflects the increased usable stateline flows which resulted from <br /> <br />the Compact and operation of John Martin Reservoir. <br /> <br />Another sig- <br />",,4\Jf.Q. <br />From 1974 to ~\'i7q-gfo- <br /> <br />t v'~ I. <br />1982 the slope of the curves are less than at any other time dur \q~, Q~{~ <br />~e"" <br />ing the study period. indicating a change in the relationship ~~ <br /> <br />nificant break in slope appears starting in 1974, <br /> <br />between usable stateline flows and available water supply in the <br /> <br />basin. <br /> <br />The diagrams of Usable Stateline Flow vs. John Martin Reservoir <br /> <br />Inflows and John Martin Reservoir Outflows (sets 2 and 3) also <br /> <br />show breaks in slope corresponding to the same periods as noted <br /> <br /> <br />for the double-mass diagrams inset 9. It should be noted that <br /> <br />the flows above John Martin Reservoir (the sum of the Arkansas <br /> <br />River at Las Animas and the Purgatoire River at Las Animas) de- <br /> <br /> <br />clined as a result of the Compact in 1949, Some declin~was anti- <br /> <br /> <br />c i pa ted and resu 1 ted by remov ing the downs tream call f ro'Jil<obe:low <br /> <br />John Martin Reservoir and thereby allowing the upstream users to <br /> <br />increase their diversions, When evaluating the usable stateline <br /> <br /> <br />flows, itis not appropriate to directly compare the post-comp~ct <br /> <br /> <br />and pre-compact relationships between usable stateline flows and <br /> <br /> <br />the combined flows at the Las Animas, Observing the diagrams for <br /> <br />the post-c~mpact period. it can be seen that a relatively constant <br /> <br /> <br />relationship was maintained until the last 11 years of record, In <br /> <br />this time period (i.e, 1974 to 198A). the usable stateline flows <br /> <br />declined in relation to the inflows to John Martin Reservoir. <br />