Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />into concrete form before, in the manner I am putting it. <br /> <br />All the lands naturally tributary to and lying within the <br /> <br /> <br />basin of Colorado Rivbr suitable for irrigation, a~,benefi- <br /> <br />cial use of water, should be declared now to have a prior <br />ri~ht to the water, to be not affected by any development above <br /> <br />or below. <br /> <br />Thero is enouGh water in the basin to provide a <br /> <br />very large surplus above this amount of water necessary, <br /> <br />if this right be granted and given. <br /> <br />It is fair to every <br /> <br />state which has lands lying naturally tributary to that <br /> <br />basin. <br /> <br />The further devtlopment of the waters of the river <br /> <br />will be termed surplus waters. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I would like to say at this point that the amount of <br /> <br /> <br />lands in the basin naturally tributary to the waters of the <br /> <br />river, and lyin~ naturally in the basin, and under easy <br /> <br />access of irrigation, would be easily detormined by a board <br />of engineers, workin~ under the direction of the Reclamation <br /> <br />Service, or even by the application of Mr Davis's report. <br /> <br />Those lands naturall:, tributary are eas ily ascertai nable, <br /> <br />and readily Gotten at, and there can be very little dispute <br /> <br />over it. <br /> <br />There would be some differences of opinion, but <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />the differences would not be of any large amount. <br />Then the projects that have further use for the <br />Colorado River, and do not lie directly within the natural <br />basin, but farther away from the river-- and that would <br />include all schemeS of any shape that mi~ht be proposed-- <br /> <br />Would have water rithts out of the surplus waters of the <br />