Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, , <br />Ii '" <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />recreation. Some also supply water for irrigation and <br />most are used for fishing and provide a habitat for <br />wildlife. Many of these reservoirs were constructed by <br />the U.S_ Army Corps of Engmeers in the Salt and <br />Papillion Creek drainage casins. Other medium.size <br />reservoirs have been bUilt by the U.S. Soil Conserva- <br />tion Service and the natural resources districts <br />Thousands of small.size reservoirs of less Ihan 1,000 <br />acre-feet of storage have been constructed as farm <br />ponds. grade-stabilization structures and Irrigation <br />reuse pits. A few smail-size reservOirs have been con. <br />structed lor mUnicipal use. Although all of Ihese small. <br />size and medium-size reservOirs provide benefIts In. <br />eluding supplemental water supply. they also deplete <br />annual streamflow because they lose water by seepage <br />and evaporation, However, the losses by seepage <br />recharge the groundwater reservoir. <br />Many other potential surface sites for storage exist <br />in the state. Those which have been studied to date <br />are identified In Chapter 3 of this report. Although sur. <br />face sites are numerous, perhaps the greatest poten. <br />tial for water storage is underground. Storage in the <br />groundwater reservoir to provide supplemental water <br />probably is of greater Importance In Nebraska than in <br />most other states. Because of unique geologic condi. <br />tions that led to an accumulation of thick deposits of <br />sill. sand. and gravel. much of Nebraska is underlain <br />with a vast underground reserVOir. Water stored in <br />groundwater reservOirs or space above such reservoirs <br />can provide storage for later use. Water thus stored is <br />less vulnerable to loss from evaporation than in water <br />stored in surface.water reservoirs. <br />The concept of reservoir operation. both surface and <br />underground. is that of storing during periods of wet <br />years and large overland runoff and of use through <br />drawdown during peak demands andlor dry years. The <br />opportunity and challenge are to integrate and manage <br />water in bolh surface and groundwater reservoirs. <br />That water can be stored in groundwater reservoirs <br />has been established in Nebraska and elsewhere, Ex. <br />perimental recharge through wells has been attemp.- <br />ted by the City of Uncoln and in Hamilton County. One <br />reservoir has been constructed in the Little Blue Natural <br />Resources District with groundwater reCharge as a <br />main benefit. Others have been proposed. The most <br />dramatic example of potential lor underground storage <br />is the groundwater mound Ihat has developed south <br />of the Platte River from near Sutherland to Minden. In. <br />advertent seepage losses from the Nebraska Public <br />Power District's Sutherland Reservoir and canal system <br />through Lake Maloney. coupled with that from canals. <br />reservoirs and Irrigated lands of the Central Nebraska <br />Public Power and Irrigation Districts proJect. account <br />lor an estimated increase in groundwater slorage of 10 <br />million acre.feel. <br />Most other surface.water projects also have con. <br />ttlbuted to groundwater Storage. One area in particular <br />provides an example of the prinCiple of conjunctive use, <br />i.e., integrated use of surface water and groundwater. <br /> <br />Irrigation in Dawson County had an early (1890s) <br />reliance on water diverted Irom a limited Plalte River <br />supply. Irrigators there progressed to using water from <br />private wells constructed since Ihe 1930s which are <br />supplemented with water stored in Lake McConaughy <br />through rights that were acquired. The net effect has <br />been to balance water supplied from streamttows and <br />storage releases WIth intensive groundwater withdrawal <br />by wells and by crops through subirrigation. Water <br />levels have been maintained by the distribution of the <br />surlace water. Drainage problems have been minimiz- <br />ed by groundwater use. <br /> <br />C. "OPPORTUNITY" AND "NEED" FOR <br />SUPPLEMENTAL USE <br /> <br />Supplemental water cannot be viewed without con- <br />sideration of the available water supply and oppor- <br />tunIties for use. For purposes of this report "opportuni- <br />ty" is defined as a situation where a party would be <br />likely 10 utilize water not currently available at a par- <br />ticular location. Whether it is wise to take advanlage <br />01 that opportunity. in terms of cost or other factors is <br />a marter 10 be evaluated in connection with the Chapter <br />4 discussion of constraints and impacts. <br />Need refers to the degree of good that water can do <br />for a party or group if supplied. Water that is judged <br />available and needed by one group may not be <br />judged in a like fashion by another. Competition for an <br />available water supply may result. Water needs come <br />about because someone or some group perceives a <br />water Shortage for one or more particular uses in a <br />specific area. Thus, need may be identified. The need <br />may range by degree from that which is wanted or <br />desired 10 that which is a requisite. Some needs may <br />continue to exist indefinitely necessitating adjustment <br />to an existing supply. Another need might await its turn. <br />Implementation 01 an action 10 provide a supplemen- <br />tal supply might be delayed until one or more condi- <br />tions change or are changed and favorable cir- <br />cumstances permit the action to lake place. In other <br />cases a need, identified as a water quantity or quality <br />problem, might not be sufficiently serious to warrant <br />action until some tIme in the future as conditions <br />worsen. <br />Another factor in deciding whether to fulfill a need <br />is evaluation of the constraints and impacts identified <br />in Chapter 4. Economic (or financial) evaluation com. <br />pares the economic cost of fulfilling a need to the <br />economic benefil It provides. Cost of developing the <br />supplemental supply plus the costs reflecting the <br />adverse Impacts can be compared to the willingness <br />of project beneficiaries to pay for the supplemental <br />water. ThiS willingness to pay presumably reflects the <br />economic benefits conferred by the project. (Payment <br />In this context includes direct water-use charges and <br />Indltect charges through increased property taxes in <br />the project area.) This financial approach to evaluating <br /> <br />'-3 <br />