My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06636
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06636
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:23:41 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:46:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8543.900
Description
Closed Basin Division - Project Funding
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
3/14/1989
Title
Agenda Item 8 - March 20-21 1989 - Board Meeting -- Closed Basin Project Cost-Sharing Agreement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />N <br />'>> <br />~.... <br />..... <br />'.~ .., <br /> <br />'-...' <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />STATE OF COLORI\DO <br />- <br /> <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />721 State Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 60203 <br />Phone: (303) 866,3441 <br /> <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />J. William McDonald <br />Director <br />David W. Walker <br />Deputy Director <br /> <br />M E M 0 RAN DUM <br /> <br />TO: Members, CWCB <br /> <br />FROM: Bill McDonald <br /> <br />DATE: March 14, 1989 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Agenda Item 8, March 20-21, 1989, Board Meeting <br />--Closed Basin Project Cost-sharing Agreement <br /> <br />Subsequent to the January Board meeting, I prepared a draft <br />cost-sharing agreement and have had one negotiating session con- <br />cerning that draft with the Bureau of Reclamation. The major <br />i terns which need to be brought to the Board's attention are as <br />follows: <br /> <br />(1) Reclamation has agreed, as the board suggested, <br />that there is no necessity for a formal escrow <br />account into which Board funds would be deposited. <br />Rather, the Board will commit, upon the execution <br />of a cost-sharing agreement, to encumber the <br />required $6 million so that it will be reserved <br />for and dedicated to the purposes of the cost- <br />sharing agreement. This is standard state pro- <br />cedure in terms of encumbering funds upon execution <br />of a contract so it will work fine for the state. <br /> <br />(2) Reclamation would prefer that payments by the Board <br />be made on a quarterly advance basis, with adjust- <br />ments made in the billing for a subsequent quarter <br />to reflect costs actually incurred in the preceding <br />quarter. I see no problem with this arrangement <br />and recommend that the Board agree to it. <br /> <br />(3) The key issue to be addressed is how to insure that <br />the federal government will complete the project <br />through Stage 5. Based upon past actions of the <br />Administration, there is some reason to be <br />concerne~, that Reclamation would endeavb~ to obtain <br />Board cost-sharing money in order to complete <br />Stage 4 of the project, and then refuse to proceed <br />with Stage 5. In an effort to protect against this <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.