My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06613
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:23:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:45:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.50
Description
CRSP - Power Rates
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/16/1982
Author
USDOE/WAPA
Title
Hearing on Information Forum, CRSP, Proposed Adjustments of Transmission and Power Rates
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1 other words, how prc the funds dcsignated that are appropriate? <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />MH. COOK: I think funding, 1lI0st of the time between years, <br /> <br />3 is mostly for features ora project that are necessary to be <br /> <br />~ built, and so the annual budgets of the project, once started <br /> <br />5 in construction, usuplly contain the funding for features or to <br /> <br />~ be initi~ted in that particular year. It could well be <br /> <br />7 different because in water supply features, a water supply <br /> <br />R feature may serve blocks, but the block would not come on line <br /> <br />9 until the specific distribution features Cor that block had <br /> <br />10 been completed ano so it would be very difficult to go' in and <br /> <br />II look at the appropriate budgets and determine whether or not <br /> <br />12 the block was there or not. So budgets are mostly Identified <br /> <br />,'- <br /> <br />13 with construction of features of a project. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />MR. HELSBERG: Those features then, could they be <br /> <br />15 identified with a particular block of a project? <br /> <br />111 <br /> <br />r-<H. COOK: Well, in some instances they could. In other' <br /> <br />17 instances that feature may serve a multiple of blocks. Take <br /> <br />18 for instance a large irrigation project that had one main <br /> <br />19 rescvoir that would provide the water supply, and you may have <br /> <br />20 spent the first five years building that resevoir. The <br /> <br />21 irrigation blocks would not come on line until distribution <br /> <br />22 facilities had been completed for each block of irrigated land. <br /> <br />23 So you would then -- you may have the next five years of <br /> <br />2~ instruction just pointed towprds the construction of those <br /> <br />25 distribution facilities then on line in each year after that <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />Intermou~tain Court Reporters <br />.,r., , '10 r. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.