My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06607
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06607
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:23:32 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:45:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8029
Description
Section D General Correspondence - Colorado Agencies
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
12/1/1960
Author
Miller and Chutkow
Title
Report on Ground Water Problems and Recommendations for Further Study and Legislative Consideration
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OGHnl <br /> <br />Preliminary Report <br /> <br />-7- <br /> <br />September 27, 1960 <br /> <br />call to your attention to the following: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The general recommendation of Mr. Harold E. Thomas in <br />his paper on "Essentials for Optimum Use of Ground Water <br />Resources" as presented to the Western Resources Confer- <br />ence in 1959, particularly the summary on page 19l of the <br />report of that conference; Colorado State University Experi- <br />ment Station Bulletins 504-5, Ground Water in Colorado, and <br />Water and the Law particularly, and pages 22 to 25 of 505-5. <br />The article of Robert O. Thomas in Journal of Irrigation <br />and Drainage Division proceedings of the American Society <br />of Civil Engineers, December, 1959, page 4l, particularly <br />pages 53 through 63 on the question of ground water manage- <br />ment, the use of ground water reservoirs, conjunctive opera- <br />tion of surface and ground water reservoirs, and the use of <br />public districts in operation, regulation, and financing. <br /> <br />A candid examinat ion of the reasons behind ground water I egislation and <br />the resistance to it involves the basic question of the relationship between <br />ground water withdrawals and stream flow. The science of hydrology <br />recognizes water as part of the hydrologic cycle whether it is ground <br />water or surface water. Perhaps an extreme statement would be that if <br />we disregard time and quantity. every withdrawal of water from the ground <br />will effect surface water some place, some time, in some quantity, no <br />matter how infinitt'Simal. The technical subcommittee placed its judgment <br />of ground water withdrawals "which may effect streamflow prom ptly or <br />within an irrigation season" perhaps within four miles or two miles on <br />either side of the stream. The normal rate of movement of ground water <br />to the stream is estimated at four feet per day. <br /> <br />The inter-re lationship of ground water withdrawal upon stream flow <br />requires a great deal of additional investigation. So far as is known to <br />your consultants and to its technical subcommittee and advisory committee <br />members, there is no established scientific method of measurement and <br />computation. At the present time the problem of the possible adverse <br />effect of pumping upon stream flow represents a more serious problem in <br />the Arkansas Valley basin than it does in the South Platte basin. Your <br />consultants request additional time to consult with the United States <br />Geological Survey in both the ground water and surface water division, the <br />experiment station of the Colorado State University, the State Engineer, <br />and the Colorado Water Conservation Board, to document and determ ine <br />the needs and possible method of carrying out the assignment in paragraph <br />A above. <br /> <br />- 22 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.