Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />(~ <br />CJ1 <br />..... <br />.... <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />is that subsequent personnel have not been knowledgeable about portions of the <br />report prepared by or methodology used by their predecessors, <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Detailed consumptive uses and losses data have been provided by the Bureau of <br />Reclamation, but little to explain the methods used in compiling data for the <br />draft Uses and Losses Report has been included. A technical sununary should be <br />provided which explains the sources of data, and where appropriate, the methods <br />used for estimation, <br /> <br />Several of the project managers have indicated that representatives of the Upper <br />Basin States have been contacted and asked for estimates of various consumptive <br />use data in their States. Apparently, some data provided by the States has not <br />been included in the draft Uses and Losses Report. New Mexico representatives, <br />in particular, indicate that the information provided to the Bureau has been <br />largely ignored, or at least is not evident in the Report. If the data provided <br />by the States are not used, the Bureau should explain its methodology for <br />computing the data and the rationale for not using the data provided by the <br />States, <br /> <br />The draft Uses and Losses Report includes estimates of main-stem reservoir <br />evaporation. These data do not agree with the data provided by the Bureau of <br />Reclamation in the Status of Reservoir Reports, or the historical data on the <br />24-month studies, As an example, the following is a comparison of evaporation <br />from Lake Powell as listed in the draft Uses and Losses Report and Historical <br />data from the 24-Month Studies. <br /> <br />Comparison of Lake Powell Evaporation <br /> <br />\,later Year <br /> <br />1981 <br /> <br />1982 <br /> <br />1983 <br /> <br />1984 <br /> <br />1985 <br /> <br />Average 1981-1985 <br /> <br />Draft Uses 457.9 <br />& Losses Report* <br /> <br />418.4 <br /> <br />519.5 <br /> <br />567.7 <br /> <br />552,0 <br /> <br />503.1 <br /> <br />* <br />24-Month Study 583.0 <br /> <br />575.0 <br /> <br />628.0 <br /> <br />619.0 <br /> <br />615,0 <br /> <br />604.0 <br /> <br />* <br />Units 1,000 acre-feet <br /> <br />'Either the draft Uses and Losses Report or historical evaporation data is wrong. <br />The erroneous data should be identified and corrected. <br /> <br />The draft Uses and Losses Report does not report the lower basin main stem <br />channel losses. Page iv is a sununary of consumptive uses and losses in the <br />Colorado River System. It includes a line entitled "Other -- Reservoir <br />evaporation and channel loss;" however, the figures listed are sums of reservoir <br />evaporations contained on tables UC-l and LC-l, No estimates of channel losses <br />are included in these tables. <br /> <br />Since the time available to submit comments is limited, every effort should be <br />made to have finalized comments to the Bureau of Reclamation prior to the October <br />2, 1989 comment deadline. <br /> <br />5 <br />