Laserfiche WebLink
<br />plan for John Martin Reservoir; (3) decreased plains precipitation; and <br />(4) soil conservation measures; and <br />WHEREAS, the Kansas representative to the Investigation <br />CommiUee has concluded that further investigation of whether the <br />waters of the Arkansas River have been or are being materially depleted <br />in usable quantity or availability should examine: (1) development and <br />use of alluvial wells in Colorado; (2) pre-compact use of the conservation <br />pool of John Martin Reservoir; (3) transmountain return flows; (4) post, <br />compact development and use of upstream storage reservoirs; (5) <br />tributary inflows and precipitation records; (6) extreme flood events and <br />their impact on stream now data; (7) surface diversions in Colorado <br />Water District 67, 17, and 14; (8) development of stock ponds in Colorado <br />"and their potential impacts on tributary inflow to the Arkansas River; (9) <br />the impacts of the 1980 Storage Resolution for John Martin Reservoir on <br />relationship of usable stateline flows to upstream flows; and (10) <br />tributary inflows from the eastern plains of Colorado. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, Be it Resolved by the Arkansas River Compact <br />Administration that the Investigation CommiUee constituted by the <br />Resolution of March 28th, 1985, as amended on July 12, 1985, shall <br />continue with its investigation of matters upon which the Committee has <br />mutually agreed that further Im'estigatlon should be undertaken." <br /> <br />12 <br />