Laserfiche WebLink
<br />believe that postcompact development in Colorado has af- <br />fected the flows of the Arkansas River and is one of the <br />causes of postcompact depletions to usable state line flows. <br />5. Based upon the results of the mass diagram analy- <br />ses, it is Kansas' belief that additional investigation <br />should be made of postcompact depletions. This investiga- <br />tion would include study and analyses of the following <br />items: <br /> <br />A. Development and use of alluvial wells in <br /> <br />Colorado; <br /> <br />B. Pre compact use of the conservation pool of <br />John Martin Reservoir; <br />C. Transmountain return flows; <br />D. Postcompact development and use of upstream <br />storage reservoirs; <br />E. Tributary inflows and precipitation records; <br />F. Extreme flood events and their impact on <br />streamflow data; <br />G. Surface diversions in Colorado Water Dis- <br />tricts 67, 17, and 14; <br />H. Development of stock ponds in Colorado and <br />their potential impact on tributary inflow to the Arkansas <br />River; <br /> <br />I. The impacts of the 1980 Storage Resolution <br />for John Martin Reservoir on the relationship of usable <br />state line flows to upstream flows; and <br />J. Tributary inflows from the eastern plains of <br /> <br />Colorado. <br /> <br />-35- <br />