My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06515
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:23:07 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:41:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8221.112.I
Description
Central Arizona Project
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
5/1/1983
Title
Information Packet: Tucson Aqueduct - Phase B Alternative Plans
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />C.ol <br />~ <br />r;t) <br />c.' <br />( <br />Co <br /> <br />Indian Reservation. One turnout, located about 2 miles south of Tangerine <br />Road, would be provided for the Avra Valley Irrigation District. From this <br />turnout a pipe/canal delivery line and two pumping plants would be con- <br />structed to deliver CAP water to the District's boundary. Between West <br />22nd Street and West 36th Street, a turnout at elevation 2,800 feet would <br />be provided to deliver water to Tucson's proposed water treatment plant. <br />Since the aqueduct would be located adjacent to the treatment plant site, <br />very little connecting facilities would be necessary. Near Ajo Road a <br />turnout would be provided for the Schuk Toak District. From this turnout a <br />pipeline would be constructed to the reservation. At the south boundary of <br />the San Xavier Reservation a turnout would be provided for the same enti- <br />ties identified in the West Side Plan. <br /> <br />To provide electrical service to the pumping plants two options are under <br />study. This study is being conducted by the Oepartment of Energy, Western <br />Area Power Administration. The first option would provide service by <br />tapping existing electrical facilities near the pumping plant sites and <br />constructing new facilities from the taps to the plants. The second would <br />provide service by modifying the existing Tucson Substation and construct- <br />ing new facilities that would generally parallel the aqueduct alignment to <br />the plants. <br /> <br />For a more detailed list of the physical characteristics of the plans, see <br />table 1. <br /> <br />EVALUATION OF PLANS <br /> <br />Information to compare the plans was collected on a variety of sUbjects. <br />Those subjects that showed significant differences between plans and would <br />affect plan selection are discussed below. Other factors that were not <br />different between plans, such as water quality, are not discussed here, but <br />they will be included in the PR/EIS. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.