My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06512
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06512
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:23:06 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:41:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.200.02.I
Description
Southern Nevada Water Project
State
NV
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1995
Author
Dames & Moore
Title
Environmental Assessment of the Colorado River Commission's Proposed Southern Nevada Water System Facilities Improvement Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o <br />,. . <br />.- <br /> <br />l.f) <br />- <br /> <br />c,.. <br /> <br />EXECUfIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />Several recent studies evaluating projected <br />southern Nevada water demand versus the <br />capacity of the existing water supply system <br />have concluded that, although Nevada has legal <br />access to its Colorado River Water Allocation, <br />the capacity of the system to deliver this water <br />will no longermeet~y May 1997. <br /> <br />In response to increasing water demands, the <br />Colorado River Commission is proposing to <br /> <br /> <br />re water from <br />e ead to the Las Vegas Valley service area <br />by May 1997 to~ to <br />improve the reliab~eatment <br />and delivery system. <br /> <br />The water treatment and main pumping facilities <br />are located approximately 12 miles southeast of <br />Las Vegas in the River Mountains area west of <br />Lake Mead. Principal system improvements <br />include: <br /> <br />. construction of a new 12-foot-diameter <br />Parallel River Mountains Tunnel; <br />. construction of a 6O-million-gallon water <br />storage tank; <br />. construction of a 5-million-gallon <br />regulating tank; <br />. improvements to the existing Alfred <br />Merritt Smith Water Treatment Facility; <br />. installation of an 8- to IO-foot-diameter <br />pipeline from the water treatment facility <br />to the new tunnel; <br />. installation of two new pumping plants; <br />and <br />. electrical improvements to the power <br />system. <br /> <br />In addition, the proposed project includes three <br />pipeline laterals, totalling approximately 42,000 <br />feet in length, to be installed in the urban areas <br />of the Cities of Henderson, Las Vegas, and <br />North Las Vegas, as well as a new pumping <br />plant in North Las Vegas. <br /> <br />Project construction would begin upon receipt of <br />all necessary agency approvals, expected in the <br />summer of 1995, and would require 20 to 24 <br />months to complete. <br /> <br />The majority of the proposed project facilities <br />are located on federal lands withdrawn for water <br />project use. These lands fall under the <br />jurisdiction of the Bureau of Reclamation. <br />Based on their preliminary review of the project <br />plans, the Bureau of Reclamation decided that an <br />Environmental Assessment for the project would <br />be necessary under the National Environmental <br />Policy Act. This Environmental Assessment has <br />been prepared in accordance with the Bureau of <br />Reclamation guidelines for implementing the <br />National Environmental Policy Act. <br /> <br />The Environmental Assessment describes the <br />affected environment, identifies potential <br />environmental consequences of the proposed <br />action, and identifies mitigation measures that <br />have been incorporated into the project to <br />minimi7e impacts for each of the following <br />resource areas: <br /> <br />. Air Quality; <br />. Geology and Mineral Resources; <br />. Hydrology; <br />. Biological Resources; <br />. Land Use and Recreation; <br />. Cultural Resources; <br />. Paleontologic Resources; <br />. Noise; <br />. Visual Resources; <br />. Transportation; and <br />. Socioeconomics. <br /> <br />The Environmental Assessment also addresses <br />the No Action alternative, and two alternatives <br />considered but eliminated from detailed <br />evaluation: the Southern Nevada Water <br />Authority Treatment and Transmission Facility <br />Acceleration Alternative; and the Water <br />Conservation Alternative. <br /> <br />ix <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.