Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i i t ;.~;:.~. <br /> <br />002837 <br /> <br />TRAVELTIME, LONGITUDINAL-DISPERSION, REAERATION, AND BASIN <br />CHARACTERISTICS OF THE WHITE RIVER, COLORADO AND UTAH <br /> <br />I' <br /> <br />By Jeanne M. Boyle and No~man E. Spahr <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />The White River basin contains extensive energy resource developments <br />which might affect the quantity and quality of the basin's water resources. <br />The purpose of this study was to determine traveltime, longitudinal- <br />dispersion, reaeration, and basin characteristics of the White River which can <br />be used in making decisions concerning the energy developments. <br /> <br />Traveltime and longitudinal-dispersion characteristics were measured for <br />the White River using dye tracers. Discharges ranged from 281 to 1,840 cubic <br />feet per second and velocities ranged from 1.26 to 3.17 miles per hour. <br />Traveltimes were determined for discharges other than measured discharges by a <br />graphical method and a linear-regression method, Longitudinal-dispersion <br />coefficients ranged from 284 square feet per second at a discharge of <br />539 cubic feet per second to 3,560 square feet per second at a discharge of <br />1,580 cubic feet per second. <br /> <br />Reaeration was measured using a modified-tracer technique in four reaches <br />of the White River during a medium-flow period in August 1982. Reaeration <br />coefficients at 200 Celsius ranged from 5.3 to 25.3 per day, The results of a <br />comparison with measured reaeration coefficients and reaeration coefficients <br />predicted using empirical equations showed that the most accurate equations <br />were by Bennett and Rathbun (1972) and Isaacs and Gaudy (1968). <br /> <br />Basin ch~racteristics were determined using U.S. Geological Survey topo- <br />graphic maps, precipitation data from the National Weather Service, and aerial <br />photographs taken on September 11, 1981. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The White River basin contains extensive energy resources consisting of <br />oil, natural gas, coal, and oil shale. Existing and planned energy develop- <br />ment might affect the quantity and quality of the basin's water resources. <br />This.report is part of a 4-year assessment of the White River basin from water <br />years 1981 through 1984. The objectives of the assessment were to describe <br />the existing hydrology of the basin and to evaluate some of the potential <br />environmental effects of energy-resource development on the quantity and <br />quality of the water resources in the basin. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />~, <br />