Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3, Municipal water use would be added as an authorized purpose of use, <br /> <br />The ''Notice of Petition" contains background infonnation regarding the proposed long-tenn <br />transfer and the State Water Resource Control Board's authority regarding the petition, Comments <br />on this petition must be submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board by December IS, <br />1998; however, since the draft Environmental Impact ReportlEnvironmental Impact Statement <br />(EIRlEIS) will not be completed until late 2000, supplemental materials may be filed up to 90 days <br />after the draft EIRlEIS is issued. As you are aware, the IID/SDCW A proposed water <br />conservation/transfer program is one of the core transfers included in the the Board's December 17, <br />1997, draft California 4.4 Plan, <br /> <br />On November 13, 1998, Reclamation met with representatives from the Colorado River <br />Basin states and the International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) to discuss its studies <br />regarding improvement of the salinity and reliability of flows delivered to Mexico at the Southerly <br />International Boundary (SIB), During the meeting, Commissioner Bemal ofIBWC indicated that <br />Mexico continues to raise concerns regarding: <br /> <br />. The fluctuation of the salinity levels of the water delivered at the SIB, and <br /> <br />. The desire to have all of its water delivered at the Northerly International Boundary. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bemal further indicated that the federal agencies are focusing on these issues and it <br />is his desire to keep the discussions in the technical arena, rather than allowing them to move into <br />the political arena. In early 1999, IBWC will meet with its counterpart from Mexico to discuss these <br />issues raised by Mexico. It is IBWC's position that all of the tenns of the United States agreements <br />with Mexico are being met. However, there may be something that can be done to address these <br />issues that is acceptable to the United States. ' <br /> <br />During the meeting, representatives from Reclamation indicated that several studies to <br />address concerns regarding the salinity concentrations at the SIB have been conducted, Currently <br />water delivered to Mexico at the SIB comes from drains and waste ways from the Yuma area as well <br />as water pumped from the Minute 242 well field, The salinity of the drainage water is approximately <br />1,400 ppm, but at times there are spikes in the salinity concentrations that reach 1,800 ppm. An <br />objective of Reclamation's studies was to continue to deliver 140,000 acre-feet of water at the SIB <br />at a salinity concentration of I ,200 ppm. From the studies that were conducted by Reclamation, the <br />pool of alternatives was narrowed to three alternatives, Within the three alternatives, the first two <br />steps to be taken to address the salinity spikes are the same, These steps include: I) replace the <br />existing stage pumps at the Boundary Pumping Plant with variable pumps and 2) construct a direct <br />diversion from the Yuma Main Drain to the Bypass Drain that currently delivers drainage water from <br />the Wellton-Mohawk area to the Santa Clara Slough. <br /> <br />During the meeting, the states' representatives indicated that further infonnation describing <br />the proposal was needed along with more time to evaluate the alternatives. Based upon that <br />discussion, Reclamation will provide additional infonnation on the alternatives being considered <br />within a couple of weeks and will hold another meeting with the Basin State representatives on <br />December 16, 1998, in Las Vegas, Nevada. <br /> <br />4 <br />