My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06091
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06091
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:21:13 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:25:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.700
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Annual Operating Plans and Reports
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
11/1/1974
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Annual Operating Plan Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Colorado 1974 -1975
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1078 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the actual inflow computed frolllmeasured outflow and change in storage <br />was used. Upstream transmountain diversions were added back to the reser- <br />voir inflow to give undepleted inflow to Ruedi Reservoir. <br /> <br />A probability curve for Ruedi undepleted inflow was computed by the <br />modified California method and is shown graphically on exhibit 1. <br />Annual inflow of a magnitude equaled ,or exceeded .50 percent of the <br />time was considered the most probable inflow, that with a 90 percent <br />chance of being equaled or exceeded was considered to be the reasonable <br />minimum, and that with only a 10 percent chance of being equaled or ex- <br />ceeded was considered the reasonable maximum. .The October through March <br />inflow was the average 1960 through 1973 inflow for this period. After <br />October through March inflow was subtracted, the remainder was distributed <br />between the months of April through September according to the distribu- <br />tion of the mean undepleted inflow. From the undepleted inflow, the <br />corresponding transmountain diversions were subtracted. The transmountain <br />diversions were the most probable, the reasonable minimum, and the reason- <br />able maximum values for Busk-Ivanhoe and Charles H. Boustead Tunnel diver- <br />sions as determined by probability' studies, exhibit 2. Storable inflow <br />was considered to be the ~esulting depleted inflow less bypass for the <br />protection of recreational ~alues, including fishing on the Fryingpan <br />River below Ruedi Reservoir. . <br /> <br />Minimum Reservoir Release <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The bypass, not to exceed the stream inflow, is 39 c.f.s. for the <br />months of November through April, and 110 c.f.s. for May through <br />October. At the request of State and Federal fish and wildlife rep- <br />resentatives, the bypass for the period September 1 through November 15 <br />will be 100 c.f.s. to facilitate downstream fishery and the brown <br />trout hatch. At the request of Colorado River interests, August <br />bypass will be at a minimum of 150,c.f.s. ' <br /> <br />Reservoir Operation <br /> <br />Operation of Ruedi Reservoir through November 15 is in compliance with <br />a request by fish and wildlife interests. Releases from the reservoir <br />are to be held to 100 c.f.s. for the period October 1 through November 15. <br />Then, in order to provide maximum flood protection below the dam, the <br />reservoir will be drawn down by March 31 to a point theoretically <br />54,800 acre-feet, where refilling would be assured under reasonable <br />minimum inflow conditions computed from the probability study. An <br />estimate of probable inflow would be made early in March when actual <br />conditions become known from the March 1 snow forecast and drawdown <br />would be adjusted accordingly. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />West'Slope recreation interests requested that the reservoir water level <br />not be drawn down below elevation 7706.0 (53,122 acre-feet) which is two <br />feet above the bottom of the Forest Service boat ramp. Under reasonable <br />maximum and most probable inflow conditions, the reservoir would theoret- <br />ically be drawn down to this capacity. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.