Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Annual Report for 1968 <br /> <br />"Every appropriator of water shall use, in a diligent manner, such <br />methods and equipment, as ditches, dams, headgates, wasteways, pumps, <br />wells, measuring devices, and supplemental points oC diversion, where <br />necessar,Y, to capture the appropriator's full decree. Unless and until such <br />methods have been so utilized, neit!ler the state engineer nor his dul,)' <br />authorized representative shall be required to curtail diversions by a <br />junior appropriator to supply such senior appropriator. It shall be pre- <br />sumed that an appropriator is using the maximum capacit,r from all sources <br />in computing total decree diversions." <br /> <br />Water districts as such may be eliminated and one district established <br />for the entire river basin. It is also proposed to have one judge designated <br />to preside over a water court that would hear contests for the the whole <br />river district. One court clerk would keep records of all diversions, both <br />surface and ground water. The district engineer or deputies would be <br />responsible for distribution of both surface and well water" Rules and pro- <br />ceedures for shutting down wells \....ouJd ha\o"e to be drafted and appro\'ed <br />before any action is taken. Legislation providing for these changes and many <br />more are being introduced in the present legi slature, some may become the <br />law. <br /> <br />In the Fellhauer case the Supreme Court held that the 1965 law giving <br />the State authority tn regulate and shut down irrigation wells was con- <br />stitutional. They also held that when closing down irrigation wells, material <br />injury to the senior approprlator must be lessened for the State Engineer <br />to act. The regulation must be in compliance with rules and regulations <br />issued by the state engineer prior to taking action. <br /> <br />The Colorado Fish & Game Commission were granted permission by <br />the Bent County District Court to trandsfer 5000 a.c. of the Muddy Creek <br />water dated 1915 to John Martin Reservoir on June 3, 19GB. They are per- <br />mitted to store 5,000/13,000 of the water less losses enroute originally <br />stored in Setchfield Reservoir. They must have the approval of the Arkansas <br />River Compact Administration and have a plan of operating John :-'lartin, <br />with JX:lol, satisfactoril,)" to the water right owners on the river. <br /> <br />The record of water storage in Muddy Creek Reservoir would certainly <br />not indicate that it would maintain a 10,000 a.f. pool in John Martin Reser- <br />voir. It would still be necessary for the State of Colorado under Federal <br />Consent Act to purchase water sufficient to establish and maintain such <br />a pool, and replace water lost to the river in maintaining a barrier of at <br />least 28 feet in the river at ,John Martin Reservoir. <br /> <br />The report of the Corps of Army Engineers on their survey of flood <br />conditions on the Arkansas river below John Martin Reservoir suggests <br />dams on seven tributaries in Colorado. These streams drain a large <br />acreage and in flood stage contribute substantial amounts of water to the <br />State line. If retarded or stored, some of this water might be used in <br />Colorado. <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />