Laserfiche WebLink
<br />\.821 <br /> <br /> 1950-1985 Factors % <br /> (at) (af/share )Z <br />Diversionsz 222,919 2.37 100.0 <br /> , <br />Return Flows 60,0~8 0.64 26.96 <br /> I <br />Main Canal" Consumable Loss 35,115 0.37 15.75 <br />Lateral Canals" 8,256 0,09 3.70 <br />Consumable Loss <br />Fry-Ark water n~g. 0,0 Neg <br />Transferable Yield 119,4~0 1.27 53.59 <br />'Table 3,7 and Table A3.5; based upon 93,989 shares. <br />zComputed without Fry-Ark water, Adjusted average diversi~ns = 224,203 - 1284 Fry-Ark, <br />" All participating shareholders leave this percent in the main canal. Losses from the storage canal are <br /> included in this quantity. <br />.. Shareholders on laterals would leave about 4% of ~eir diversion in the lateral to mitigate lateral loss for <br /> the other lateral shareholders, Lateral companies c9uld be evaluated individually. <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />Table 7.1 Temporary Transfer Yield' <br /> <br />Demand of New Users <br /> <br />In this operational analysis, water could be delivered anywhere on the river below Pueblo Resetvoir. <br />Due to the method of computing yield explained pre~ously, the consumptive use portion ofFLWB <br />water would be totally consumable and not subject t4 return flow analysis. Water could be used for <br />any beneficial use. The renter would have the obligation to capture the water at the designated point <br />of diversion and to cooperate with the administrative officials responsible for the river. As an <br />example, 5,000 af might be needed as a new, tempor~ry water supply for a small processing industry <br />at La Junta. Water bank water would be provided at a constant rate to be diverted either at a <br />surface structure or a well acting as an alternate point of diversion at a point 4.2 river miles below <br />the FL main headgate. River transit loss would be added to the release (next paragraph). The <br />example delivery requirements are shown in Table t2. This example is one of the simpler possible <br />uses of the FLWB; more complex delivery locations land schedules are possible and the accounting, <br />though more involved, would be similar. <br /> <br />7-16 <br />