My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05909
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05909
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:20:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:21:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.765
Description
White River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
4/1/1997
Author
USFS
Title
Aspen Highlands Ski Area - Final Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
598
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Aspen Highlands Ski Area - Final Environmenlal Impacl Slalemenl <br /> <br />Table 2. Summary of issues and concerns identified from scoping. <br />Geology An issue of concern raised was potential landslides in the proposed project area. <br />Water Water resource issues were raised by the public and agencies concerning water withdrawal for snowmaking. <br />Resources Concern was expressed regarding the effects of withdrawing water for snowmaking on stream flow in <br /> Maroon Creek and on the potential impacts of associated snowmelt runoff on water quality in Castle and <br /> Maroon creeks during the spring snowmelt period. The proposed acreage for snowmaking relative to <br /> availability of water was also a concern. Consideration of water conservation in designing facilities was <br /> requested. <br />Vegetation Identification and mapping of old growth forest on the mountain was requested. Concern regarding water <br /> depletion, avalanche control, and potential impactS of these activities on vegetation in the project area was <br /> expressed. A description of mitigation measures to minimize potential impacts on vegetation was requested. <br />Biodiversity Concerns were expressed by the public and the agencies about the amount of forest cover fragmentation <br /> associated with the cutting of new ski runs_ <br />Wildlife A major concern of both the public and the agencies was the impact of the proposed project on wildlife, <br /> primarily the reduction of wildlife habitat and use of those habitats for movement by bighorn sheep. <br /> Concern was expressed about the impact of increased human activity, particularly ski-related recreation, and <br /> facility installation and maintenance activities, on wildlife species habitat. <br />Threatened Public and agency concern was expressed regarding protection of plant, wildlife. and aquatic species listed <br />and under the Endangered Species Act (ESA 1973. as amended) as threatened or endangered or listed as Forest <br />Endangered Sensitive species by the Rocky Mountain Region of the Forest Service. In particular, concern was expressed <br />Species regarding water withdrawal for snowmaking and the potential impacts on endangered Colorado River fishes. <br /> Concerns were raised regarding the possible disturbances to raptors or other federally protected migratory <br /> birds, some of which arc also listed as Forest sensitive species for Region 2. <br />Recreation The most common issue raised was concern that implementation of the proposal would change the quality <br /> of the recreation experience at Aspen Highlands. Respondents felt that the proposed Aspen Highlands <br /> expansion focused excessively on providing expen terrain instead of terrain that would also meet the needs <br /> of beginning to intennediate skiers. Concern was also expressed over increased crowding as a result of the <br /> proposed instlllhuion of the high-speed quad in Thunderbowl. Some respondents suggested retrofitting a <br /> high-speed quad with double chairs to access this area rather than installing a quad. A request was made <br /> to preserve the Olympic Lift rather than replace it because of the exceptional views from that lift. It was <br /> suggested that the estimated Aspen Highlands mountain capacity, skier egress capacity, and snowboarding <br /> descent patterns be analyzed. Other respondents' comments suggested improved trail signage, such as <br /> identification of the easiest way down on catwalks. ski slopes, and trail maps. One respondenl opposed <br /> mountain biking access on the mountain and another requested that one trail be reserved for pedestrian <br /> access. <br />Public Health The primary concern regarding public health and safety was the potential for increased accidents (skier <br />. and Safety collisions) due to introduction of skiers of various levels of ability onto the mountain, particularly in the <br /> Thunderbnwl area Concern was also expressed about increased risk and liability if the Forest Service <br /> approves developmenl of extreme skiing terrain, particularly in bowl areas with potentially significant <br /> avalanche hazards. <br />Transportation Respondents expressed concern about potential short-tenn (during construction) and long-term impacts on <br /> transportation due to the proposed Aspen Highlands expansion. A !roggeslion to study the impact on traffic <br /> outside of the Aspen Highlands base area was made. A gondola interlink between Aspen Highlands, Aspen <br /> Mountain, and Buttermilk, or between all four Aspen resort areas was proposed in order to alleviate potential <br /> tranSpOrtation and air quality problems. as well as facilitate skier access to additional terrain. A request was <br /> made to detennine the number of resort base area parking spaces needed to accommodate the proposed <br /> expansion. <br />Air Quality Long-term adverse effects on air quality due to an increase in surrounding development and traffic was the <br /> primary air quality concern of respondents. Agency and public concern was expressed regarding additional <br /> vehicle miles traveled (VMf) in the Aspen Highlands base area because it was included in the Aspen PM,. <br /> non-attainment area. The Colorado Division of Air Pollution Control requested an accounting of additional <br /> VMf associated with the proposed expansion and compliance with federal General Confonnity Regulations. <br /> Concern was raised about Aspen's ability to maintain required air quality standards and long-term <br /> cumulative effects of ski area expansion on air quality. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Seelion I <br />Scoping and Jdenlification of Issues and Concerns <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.