Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'" <br />il.i <br />~1 <br /> <br /> <br />An Overview of the Basin's Resource-Management Problems <br /> <br />Basin's water and related resources. In reality, there is widespread <br />disagreement about who is entitled to what and, hence, about the fairness of <br />the actual distribution of benefits and costs among different parties. <br /> <br />Where these criteria are not met a problem exists with the total amount of <br />economic benefit derived from the Basin's water and related resources, the <br />distribution of these benefits, or both. Where the deviation from the criteria <br />is severe, so is the problem. <br /> <br />~N <br />., <br /> <br />These criteria are useful insofar as they focus directly on the outcomes of the <br />competition for the resources, have a solid foundation in the concepts of <br />economics, and, where sufficient information exists, lend themselves to <br />measurement. They are less than ideal, however, insofar as the conclusions <br />one draws from applying them to the Basin can vary, depending on one's <br />perspective. If the beneficiaries of a resource-management practice take a <br />narrow perspective, they probably will conclude that, for them, it yields the <br />greatest value, produces the highest standard ofliving, and is fair. Those <br />who do not share the benefits, but instead incur costs, probably will reach <br />the opposite conclusion. Those taking a broad, societal perspective, probably <br />will reach a conclusion that lies somewhere between these two extremes. <br /> <br />'1;) <br /> <br />:;:;-; <br />'4 <br /> <br />::":! <br />~'; I <br /> <br />;) <br /> <br />>;:.- <br /> <br />The different perspectives of benefits and costs are inseparably linked to the <br />political feasibility of resource-management decisions. Someone who will <br />suffer immediate and direct short-run costs from a decision is likely to <br />oppose it vociferously, while someone else seeing less tangible benefits <br />materializing over a longer period is less likely to feel compelled to offer <br />strong support. In other words, without a conscious corrective effort, there <br />can be a strong tendency for resource-management decisions to be influenced <br />most by short-run concerns, with the result that the decisions lead to less <br />than ideal outcomes. <br /> <br />01: <br />~ 3 <br />,;i <br /> <br />':~ <br /> <br />Commensurate with our charge from the Commission, we take a broad <br />perspective and apply the criteria from a federal, or national, perspective. <br />That is, we evaluate the outcomes from the competition for water and related <br />resources in the Basin in terms of the value of the goods and services <br />available to all Americans, the standard of living for all Americans, and the <br />fairness to all Americans. <br /> <br />." <br /> <br />We separate the problems into two sets. We first describe two problems that <br />represent the most serious, fundamental aspects ofthe past and current <br />failure to meet the three criteria described above. We call these the <br /> <br />( "., l~;:; ! <br />~ '.,' __...1 oJ .. <br /> <br />71 <br />