My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05838
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05838
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:20:08 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:18:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.600.20
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Studies - Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
4/16/1975
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement Supplement, Part II
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />54(.J <br /> <br />The local economy would be stimulated by increased expenditures ~f <br />about $13,000,000 or $4,333,000 annually due to Fryingpan-~rkansas <br />Project expenditures for personnel and equipment. Assuming the same <br />economic multiplier as before (i.e. 1.92), the local economy would <br />be stimulated by additional increased labor expenditures )'y con- <br />tractors of approximately $43,000,000 or $14,333,000 annually. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3. Long Term Commitments of Resources <br /> <br />During construction, a total of 770 acres ~nll be cleared, ~ith <br />about 30 acres permanently committed to the project. The loss nf <br />vegetation on most of the alinement is considered to he a relatively <br />long term resource commitment. Due to the aridity of ~he Area, <br />revegetation is expected to be slow even artificial seeding. <br /> <br />During the operation of the project, there will be additional ~vapor- <br />ative water loss from Pueblo Reservoir and the Arkansas River Reach <br />from Canon City. In addition there will be an average of 20,100 <br />acre-feet more water available for consumption in the communities <br />served. The evaporation and the consumptive use of r:his >later ~i11 <br />result in a concentration of dissolved solids. There ~ill also ce <br />more water available for degradation due to residual runoff con- <br />taining herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers and other rontaminants <br />used in the four communities. <br /> <br />Pipe, water, money, and energy will be committed over the operating <br />life of the conduit. The energy as a nonrenewable resource ".1.11 <br />be irretrievably committed. The money and ,"ater ~dl1 be commf tted <br />on an annual basis. The pipe on the other hand can he recovered <br />at any time. Tbe aesthetics at Liberty Point will he negraded <br />somewhat as long as the nearby surge tank is present. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4. Long Term Gains in Productivity <br /> <br />Over the operating life of the conduit, $4,337,600 will ~e penerated <br />annually from municipal and industrial (M&I) water 1lse. P.n additional <br />$972,900 will be generated from agricultural use of return flows <br />downstream. Using the same economic multipliers as presented in <br />Chapter 4.L. total economic productivity will he increased toy <br />$6,498,900 from agricultural uses. The total is ~herefore About <br />$10,836,500. <br /> <br />VII-2 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.