Laserfiche WebLink
<br />States Geological SlIrv~y, the Comullssiol1er of Rcdamdtion, and <br />thl..: Chid of Engineers, United States Army, to colldborate ,;",'ith <br />the Administrinion and with appropriate State offic]als in .such de- <br />termination ;lnd correlation of stream flov,' and of related datil. The <br />c,\rrying out of the cooperative studies and actlvitic.s he-rein men- <br />tioned is assigned, under the By-Laws of the Administration, to the <br />Engineering Committee. <br /> <br />(b) The above-mentioned cooperative studies anJ ilCtlvitics of <br />the Administration, during the period covered by this report, have- <br />consisted of the- establishment uf gitging stdtions, a special silt survey <br />of Juhn Martin Reservoir by the: Corps of Engineers, and the com- <br />pilation of hydrological data for the purpose of making this report <br />and for the administration of the Compact provlslOns. <br /> <br />7. Water Supply, Reservoir Operation and <br />Hydrological Data <br />The Compact year. commencing on Nm'emFer 1, 1949. began <br />with a carry-n\"Cr in the John Martin Rescr\"oir of 123,700 acree-feet <br />(If water. During the 'Ninta sturage pcnuJ, the \\ldter in sturit;;:c <br />incrcJsecJ to 158,700 Jere.feet. This increase, 30.000 3crc-fect. was. <br />hut (\() ~~cr (ent of the .r~,\)7.J, i-I.crc.-fcd ,l..:-.:umulfiting clllrin~ the.. lik.... <br />perinu thc yc:n before. Intlo\v into the reservoir through the irrig;t- <br />tioll ~,~;lo;()Jl April 1. 19,0, to Octoher 31, 19iO. \;..:t." f03.722 a~rc- <br />feet. The total inflO\v into the reservoir for the Comp3:ct year was <br />132,530 acre-feet, compared to 2n,100 acre-feet (revised) during <br />the preceding Compact year. The year ended with 'i'8,500 acre-fect <br />remaining in storage. <br />The early part of the 19;0 irrigation season was very dry. Be- <br />ginning on April 1, 1950, both states made large demands on stored <br />water. This continued until June 20, 1950, when, due to the occur- <br />rence of rains, Kansas cancelled its demand for '-\'ater. Rainfall in <br />Kansas became abundant during July and August and Kansas made <br />no further demand during th~ season for water. The low in reser- <br />voir storage ,-vas reached on July 18,19)'0, when the supply dropped <br />to 31,297 acre-fect. During the remainder of the season, inflo\l,' <br />exceeded the demands of Colorado and reservoir storage increased. <br />Included as Appendix D are the follo\l.,'ing hydrologic data.: <br />0-1. Daily discharges, Arkansas River at Pueblo, Colorado, <br />monthly totals corrected for transmountain water. <br />D-2. Daily discharges, Arkansas River at Las Animas, Colo- <br />rado. <br />D-3. Daily discharges, Purgatoire River at Las Animas, <br />Colorado. <br />D-4. Daily discharges, Arkansas River at the Colorado-Kan- <br />sas State Line. <br />D-5. Daily discharges, Arkansas River at Garden City, <br />Kansas. <br /> <br />9 <br />