Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />l 0766 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />uncontrolled area such that the flood peaks from the uncontrolled area <br /> <br /> <br />would not be materially increased. The effect of the Trinidad Reservoir <br /> <br /> <br />operation for flood control on all floods at Trinidad, COlorado, which <br /> <br /> <br />occurred during the 30-year period from January 1, 1921, through Decem- <br /> <br /> <br />ber 31, 1950, was estimated. The effect was also estimated on the maxi- <br /> <br /> <br />mum kn01<Tn flood which occurred in September 1904. Runoff from the uncon- <br /> <br /> <br />trolled drainage area (97 square miles) together with the flow through the <br /> <br /> <br />outlet works anj the uncontrolled notch from all the above floods at <br /> <br /> <br />Trinidad would :;.c:.:oss than 15,000 cubic feet per second. Flood peaks of <br /> <br /> <br />record modified by the Trinidad Reservoir are shown in table 12. <br /> <br /> <br />52. The standard project flood peak flow from the uncontrolled drain- <br /> <br /> <br />age aroa was estimated to be 28,000 cubic feet per second at Trinidad. <br /> <br /> <br />The standard p1Dject flood for the drainage area above the Trinidad dam <br /> <br /> <br />site would be controlled to a maximum outflow of 15,000 cubic feet per <br /> <br /> <br />second. Since the peak produced by the standard project storm on the un- <br /> <br /> <br />controlled drainage area occurred about three hours prior to the peak in- <br /> <br /> <br />flow to the reservoir, flow past the dam site would not contribute to the <br /> <br /> <br />peak of the flood from the uncontrolled drainage area. Plate 4 shows the <br /> <br /> <br />discharge~frequency curve for regulated conditions at Trinidad, Colorado. <br /> <br /> <br />53. Effects of the project on Arkansas River water supply. _ <br /> <br /> <br />Reservoir operation studies based on the period of record 1925-1949 were <br /> <br /> <br />made by the Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps of Engineers to evaluate <br /> <br /> <br />the effects of the irrigation storage and the regulation of the reservoir <br /> <br /> <br />inflows for flood control, respectively, on the water supplies downstream <br /> <br /> <br />from the project. These studies were needed to determine the project <br /> <br /> <br />feasibility within the administration of the Arkansas River Compact. <br /> <br /> <br />Operation of the reservoir for irrigation.under conditions a, b, and c was <br /> <br /> <br />estimated to reduce the average annual usable water supply at John Martin <br /> <br /> <br />Reservoir on the Arkansas River by 200 acre-feet. The regulation of the <br /> <br />39 <br /> <br />APPENDIX B <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />