My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05764
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05764
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:19:47 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:15:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
2100
Description
Laws-Acts-Policy Rulings Affecting CWCB and Colorado Water - Federal
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
6/4/1921
Author
Delph E Carpenter
Title
Statement of Delph E Carpenter - 06-04-21 - Before the Committee on the Judiciary - House of Representatives - RE-HR 6821
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />i.JQJ193 <br /> <br />-17- <br /> <br />1911. There were 267 days consumed from the beginning to the end in <br />the taking of testimony in that case, It has been twice argued, but <br />because of the conditions, and it being an interstate problem between <br />two sovereignties of the Union; the court is taking its time to finally <br />arrive at a decision. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />Thtlt is a long period; during which there ha7e been several changes <br />of political tldministration. Judges have died, and conditions have <br />mtlteria11y altered and changed in both Stntes in many regards. Had this <br />matter been taken up in the first instance, the L tter there in c ontro-" <br />versy, and the States entered s~riously upon a consideration of that <br />river, a greater part of the contention upon it could have been elimi- <br />nated by compact, without question, and the same may be said of other <br />river s. <br /> <br />To return just for one moment to the problem of expense, and then <br />I wi 11 not take more of your time, I was just stating that the detailed <br />information was being prepared by these various bureaus, In our State <br />of Colorado, and in New Mexico and Arizona likewise, the commissioner <br />is to look to the engineering machinery of the state for detailed facts <br />and information. It mibht well be suggested in this quarter that the <br />commissioner for the United states would naturally look to the Reclama- <br />tion Service, the power interests, the Geological Survey, and other <br />advisory bureaus for his information, and each of the States having its <br />facts largely in hand, the expense of presenting to the commission such <br />informction as may be necessary would probably largely be cered for in <br />these quarters, So the expense to the United Strtes and to the States <br />of the commission itself would be largely that of the compensation of <br />its COlTr.1issioners and the representative on behalf of the Goverrnnent, <br />including their traveling and other incidental expenses, and the sharing <br />of that expense of the commission itself - that is, its stenographers <br />and other machinery. <br /> <br />I.fit. MICH3N;;:R. He would be expected to provide for a share of that <br />general expense? <br /> <br />MR. CARP;;:!IT';R. Yes. <br /> <br />MR. MICHENER. When I say "we" I mean the Uc_.' ted States Goverrnnent. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />MR. CfJlP;:;PT3R. I think it would be proper that the Government should, <br />but if it did not, the States would doubtless do it anyhow, <br /> <br />MR. GOODYKOOl!TZ. It would seem to Ire that the expense is a mere <br />trif1in~ incident to our object in developing that phase of the matter; <br />but ",hen this cO:lIlittee takes the bill on the floor of the House it will <br />be asked a good many questions about that, and we ought to be prepared <br />to make sane intelligent reply. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.