Laserfiche WebLink
<br />000838 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the baseline conditions will be compared for each alternative. <br />As alternatives are developed, these comparison criteria will <br />become better defined and the amount of detail needed for <br />estimating effects of the alternatives will be decided. <br /> <br />The development of comparison criteria began in FY 91, however, <br />the actual application of the criteria will not be implemented <br />until FY 93. In the interim, management methods will be <br />developed and the criteria will continually be evaluated for <br />appropriateness. <br /> <br />D. other Accomplishments <br />Additional accomplishments were achieved, above and beyond the <br />scheduled tasks in Figure 1. For example, development of <br />comparison criteria was completed even though implementation will <br />not begin until FY 93. This type of foresightedness is very <br />beneficial to alternative development in that it promotes <br />alternatives that are feasible. <br /> <br />Summarv <br /> <br />The process of developing a habitat management plan has been a <br />long process and the Work Group has made significant progress <br />toward developing a workable central Platte River Habitat <br />Management Plan. The Work Group has been able to accomplish FY <br />1991 schedule tasks as presented, in addition to initiating <br />development of other tasks. with additional staff and funding, <br /> <br />8 <br />