Laserfiche WebLink
<br />23 ' <br /> <br />Consequently, the Pumping Regimen No.3 would effectively <br /> <br />reduce the groundwater flow to about the same magnitude as the <br /> <br /> <br />virgin flow that occurred in the early part of the century <br /> <br />(20,000 AF/yr). <br /> <br />Thus, the studies indicate that to counterbalance the <br /> <br /> <br />Mexican pumping and to recover waters now flowing to Mexico <br /> <br />due to irrigation on the Yuma Mesa, there will be required, in <br /> <br />time, the installation of additional wells in the United States <br /> <br /> <br />to-pump about 200,000 AF/yr. <br /> <br />The computed water level change at the end of 50 years for <br />this pumping Regimen No. 3 was subtracted from the 1972 ,.later <br />level contours as shown on Figure A-II. The results of this <br />analysis are shown on Figure B-13, ,.:hich comprises a prediction <br />of the actual water level contours, 50 years after pumping from <br />the wells in United States and Mexico. It is apparent that, <br />along a 15 mile sector of the Arizona-Sonora boundary, no ground- <br />water flow crosses the boundary; consequently, the net result of <br />the effects indicates that adequate counter measures to intercept <br /> <br /> <br />United States ground\1ater sources could be achieved. Also, of <br /> <br />the total water pump~d (21 million acre-feet), about 10-1/2 <br /> <br />million AF \-,'ould be obtained fl-om united States and about 10-1/2 <br />million l\F would be obtained from Mexico at the end of 50 years <br />(Table 2) . This Pumping Regimen No. 3 could be considered to <br />comprise a balanccd pumping condition. as about equal amounts <br /> <br />of water would originate from each country. <br />