Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Pumpin~ Re~imen No.3 <br /> <br />Yuma Ncsa "'ells (60,000 AF/vr) <br />Yuma Vallev '{ells (50.000 AFfyr) <br />Yuma Ncsa \{ells (150,000 AFhT) <br />Sonora, ~lexico 1\ells (160.000 AF/yr) <br />Omitting 65,000 AF/yr Pumped into Yuma <br /> <br />Vallev Drains <br />, <br /> <br />The computed chDnge in 1\'ater levels after 50 years of pumping <br />is shown on Figure B-12. The quantitative effects after <br />50 years of pumping are given in Table 2. It should be noted <br />that the analog model 11as so structured that the 65.000 AF/yr <br />pumped from the existing drainage 1,ells in Yuma Valley 1;as <br />omitted and 1;auld not be potentiallY salvageable. Except for <br />this change in the model input, Pumping Regimens No.2 and No.3 <br />are identical but there is a significant difference in the <br />prediction analysis. A recapitulation of No.3 pumping effects <br />follows. <br /> <br />I <br />, <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />a) Reduction and recharge from the Colorado River would be <br />57,600 AF/yr (50-year average); , <br /> <br />b) Depletion of surface drainage flows at S.l.B. would be <br />38,600 AF/yr (50-year average); <br /> <br />c) Depletion of groundwater storage in United States 110uld be <br />5,830,000 AF at the end of 50 years; <br /> <br />d) De}lletion of grouncll;atcr storage in Hcxico ,,'ould be <br />9,550,000 AF at the cnd of 50 years; <br /> <br />e) The flow from grounchmter storage at the southern limit <br />of the analog Ulodcl (auout 30 miles south of Arizonu- <br />Sonora lJo\lllClary) 11'Ould bc 21,000 AF /yr (50-year 11 vcrage) . <br /> <br />f) At the end of 50 years, thc change in ground1wter fl01>' <br />across thc J\rizona-Sonora bOllllllary to }lexico would be <br />-27,000 AF/yr and thc total floH across this boundary <br />,,'ould be about 18,000 J\P/yr. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. " <br />.' <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />, <br />