Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />POWER PRODUCTION AND MARKETING <br /> <br />The average annual energy deliverable to load oenters, adjusted to <br />account for time-value considerations in detennining the average equiv- <br />alent energy over a 100-year period after eaoh plant is in full produc- <br />tion,is 5,920,000,000 kilowatt-hours. This includes 5,558,000,000 <br />kilowatt-hours for the units of the Colorado River Storage project and <br />362,000,000 kilowatt.-hours for the Central Utah project. The average <br />annual equivalent capacity for a 100-year period when adjusted in tile <br />same manner as the energy is 1,095,000 kilowatts, including 1,036,000 <br />kilowatts for the storage project and 59,000 kilowatts for the Central <br />Utah pl'Oject. <br /> <br />During the filling period, firm energy for each year is considered <br />to be all the energy that oan be utilized within the monthly load pattern <br />to meet the annual load growth estimated for the power marl(et area by the <br />Federal Power Commission. Beginning witll the post-filling operation of <br />the reservoirs, annual !inn energy has been determined for each subsequent <br />10-year period to be the average annual generation for each period within <br />the monthly load pattern estimated by the Federal Power Commiesion. Data <br />from the study indioate that the installed capacity of l,22C,OOO kilowatts <br />is reCJ.uired in the initial decades to market power and energy at the <br />estimated load faotor for the market area of the study. When stream <br />depletions inorease in later years, project power could be marketed at <br />lO..or load factors than the area load factor. Marketing the power ini- <br />tially at the load factor for the area and later at lower load :factors <br />will result in utilizing the project plants most e:ffeot1vely to supply <br />the reCJ.uirements of the area when operated in conjunction with other <br />power systems. <br /> <br />Preliminary data :from the power market survey indicate that project- <br />produced power and energy can be readily absorbed in the market area as <br />it becomes available from the project powerplants. The estimated require- <br />ment by 1970 :for 3,659,000 kilowatts o:f new generating capacity and <br />14,]13,000,000 kilowatt-hours o:f generation can only be partially satis- <br />fied by the 1,109,000 kilowatts of capacity and 6,850,000,000 kilowatt- <br />hours of energy deliverable to load centers from the authorized units of <br />the Colorado River Storage project and the Central Utah participating <br />project. <br /> <br />Power Rates <br /> <br />As sho\/Il in the preliminary repayment study on page 48, an average <br />rate of 6 mills per kilowatt-hour for firm energy and 2.5 mills per <br />kilowatt-hour for nonfirm energy will provide sufficient revenues to <br />repay all reimbursable power costs and additional revenues to assist in <br />repayment of irrigation costs as required by the authorizing legislation. <br />Definite rate schedulee :for :firm and nonfirm power and energy will be <br />developed in accordance with Departmental policy and marketing criteria <br />when costs are IIlOre firmly established and a need for such schedules eXiste. <br /> <br />24 <br />