|
<br />Z20G
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />r
<br />r
<br />
<br />standards will not be e,tablished until we have
<br />sufficient information to a,sure that such stand-
<br />ards wi\! be equitable, workable, and enforce-
<br />able.
<br />
<br />The State of Arizona held hearings on July
<br />18, 1968, to amend its standards for interstate
<br />streams previously adopted in compliance with
<br />the Water Qualitv Act of 1965 but which had
<br />been rejected by' the FWPCA. Definite num-
<br />bers were proposed for temperature, bacterio-
<br />logical, turbidity, hydrogen-ion concentration,
<br />and radiological parameters using the recommen-
<br />dations contained in the report entitled "Water
<br />Quality Criteria" of the National Technical
<br />Advisory Committee to the Secretary of the
<br />Interior. The California Department of Public
<br />Health and the State Water Resources Control
<br />Board filed objections to the proposed amended
<br />standards as they concluded needless degradation
<br />of the river would be allowed by them, particu-
<br />larly with regard to temperature and bacteriol-
<br />ogy. Arizona amended its standards on July 18,
<br />1968, without adopting any of the changes rec-
<br />ommended by the California agencies, and they
<br />were subsequ'ently approved by the Secretary of
<br />the Interior.
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />t
<br />,
<br />
<br />f
<br />
<br />Federal Water Pollution Control
<br />Administration Report
<br />
<br />The Colorado River Basin \,yater Quality
<br />Control Project of the FWPCA issued a pre-
<br />liminary report in January 1968 entitled "Gen-
<br />eral Ba~kground on the Mineral Pollution Prob-
<br />lem in the Colorado River Basin", which brie/ly
<br />described some of the findings of the Project
<br />on the mineral pollution problem. This report
<br />which will be part of a more comprehensive
<br />report indicates that the depletion of the /low
<br />of the river by use in the Upper Basin is the
<br />chief cause of increasing salinity in the Lower
<br />Basin. The pickup of salts from irrigated areas
<br />in the Upper Basin is the largest man-made
<br />source of mineral pollution in the Upper Basin.
<br />Much of the future action on the salinity prob-
<br />lem will begin upon completion of entire
<br />F\,yPCA report, scheduled for the summer of
<br />1969.
<br />
<br />Salinity at International Boundary
<br />
<br />The third year of operation, under the five-
<br />year agreement between the United States and
<br />Mexico embodied in Minute No. 218 of the
<br />
<br />International Boundary and Water Commission,
<br />was completed on November 15, 1968. Minute
<br />218 provides that at Mexico's request the highly
<br />saline pump-drainage discharge from the Well-
<br />ton-Mohawk project in Arizona will be diverted
<br />around the Mexican diversion dam through the
<br />bypass channel constructed by the Bureau of
<br />Reclamation in 1965. It also provides that if
<br />the bypass occurs during times when Mexican
<br />delivery orders are at the Treaty minimum of
<br />900 cubic feet per second the /low of the river
<br />at Morelos diversion dam will nevertheless be
<br />not less than 900 cubic feet per second.
<br />On August 14, 1968, Governor Reagan ap-
<br />pointed Mr. Gianelli and Mr. Holburt to be the
<br />two California members on the seven-state Com-
<br />mittee of Fourteen. This Committee was fonned
<br />in 1962 in response to the request by the Com-
<br />missioner of the United States Section of the
<br />International Boundary and Water Commission
<br />to assist in resolution of the international prob-
<br />lem which arose from the discharge of Wellton-
<br />Mohawk Project drainage water into the Colo-
<br />rado River.
<br />A meeting of the Committee of Fourteen was
<br />held on December 14, 1968, at which time the
<br />U. S. Commissioner, International Boundary and
<br />Water Commission, and Bureau of Reclamation
<br />officials reported the results of the third year of
<br />operation of the bypass channel, ending Novem-
<br />ber 15, 1968. The following table summarizes
<br />some pertinent statistics from the federal reports.
<br />
<br />MINUTE NO. 218 OPERATION
<br />
<br />Year previous 1st year
<br />to agreemem 11-16-65
<br />(1964 calendar to
<br />year) 11-1.<-66
<br />
<br />2nd year
<br />11-16.66
<br />to
<br />11-Ii.67
<br />
<br />3rd year
<br />11-16.67
<br />to
<br />Il.Ii.68
<br />
<br />Wcllron-Mohawk
<br />drainage dis-
<br />charge, ae. ft. ____ 181,000
<br />Salt load, tOn5_______ 1,251,000
<br />Di\"erted around
<br />1\.lorelos Dam,
<br />:Ie. ft. mmm"________
<br />Bypass during
<br />mirumum treary
<br />order, ae. ft. "___
<br />Makeup from stor-
<br />age re1ease, ae. ft.
<br />(approx.) ._____._
<br />A \'g. salinity of
<br />ri\-"er at nonherly
<br />boundary, ppm___ 1,310 1,230 1,210 1,190
<br />
<br />The above table shows that during the first
<br />
<br />three years of operations of Minute 218 the
<br />
<br />required makenp from storage has cost users in
<br />
<br />216,900 210.530 219,500
<br />1,388,000 1,318,000 1,314,000
<br />105,830 99,100 103.900
<br />58,660 53,390 52,600
<br />15,000 35,000 47.300
<br />
<br />35
<br />
|