Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Z20G <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />r <br />r <br /> <br />standards will not be e,tablished until we have <br />sufficient information to a,sure that such stand- <br />ards wi\! be equitable, workable, and enforce- <br />able. <br /> <br />The State of Arizona held hearings on July <br />18, 1968, to amend its standards for interstate <br />streams previously adopted in compliance with <br />the Water Qualitv Act of 1965 but which had <br />been rejected by' the FWPCA. Definite num- <br />bers were proposed for temperature, bacterio- <br />logical, turbidity, hydrogen-ion concentration, <br />and radiological parameters using the recommen- <br />dations contained in the report entitled "Water <br />Quality Criteria" of the National Technical <br />Advisory Committee to the Secretary of the <br />Interior. The California Department of Public <br />Health and the State Water Resources Control <br />Board filed objections to the proposed amended <br />standards as they concluded needless degradation <br />of the river would be allowed by them, particu- <br />larly with regard to temperature and bacteriol- <br />ogy. Arizona amended its standards on July 18, <br />1968, without adopting any of the changes rec- <br />ommended by the California agencies, and they <br />were subsequ'ently approved by the Secretary of <br />the Interior. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />, <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />Federal Water Pollution Control <br />Administration Report <br /> <br />The Colorado River Basin \,yater Quality <br />Control Project of the FWPCA issued a pre- <br />liminary report in January 1968 entitled "Gen- <br />eral Ba~kground on the Mineral Pollution Prob- <br />lem in the Colorado River Basin", which brie/ly <br />described some of the findings of the Project <br />on the mineral pollution problem. This report <br />which will be part of a more comprehensive <br />report indicates that the depletion of the /low <br />of the river by use in the Upper Basin is the <br />chief cause of increasing salinity in the Lower <br />Basin. The pickup of salts from irrigated areas <br />in the Upper Basin is the largest man-made <br />source of mineral pollution in the Upper Basin. <br />Much of the future action on the salinity prob- <br />lem will begin upon completion of entire <br />F\,yPCA report, scheduled for the summer of <br />1969. <br /> <br />Salinity at International Boundary <br /> <br />The third year of operation, under the five- <br />year agreement between the United States and <br />Mexico embodied in Minute No. 218 of the <br /> <br />International Boundary and Water Commission, <br />was completed on November 15, 1968. Minute <br />218 provides that at Mexico's request the highly <br />saline pump-drainage discharge from the Well- <br />ton-Mohawk project in Arizona will be diverted <br />around the Mexican diversion dam through the <br />bypass channel constructed by the Bureau of <br />Reclamation in 1965. It also provides that if <br />the bypass occurs during times when Mexican <br />delivery orders are at the Treaty minimum of <br />900 cubic feet per second the /low of the river <br />at Morelos diversion dam will nevertheless be <br />not less than 900 cubic feet per second. <br />On August 14, 1968, Governor Reagan ap- <br />pointed Mr. Gianelli and Mr. Holburt to be the <br />two California members on the seven-state Com- <br />mittee of Fourteen. This Committee was fonned <br />in 1962 in response to the request by the Com- <br />missioner of the United States Section of the <br />International Boundary and Water Commission <br />to assist in resolution of the international prob- <br />lem which arose from the discharge of Wellton- <br />Mohawk Project drainage water into the Colo- <br />rado River. <br />A meeting of the Committee of Fourteen was <br />held on December 14, 1968, at which time the <br />U. S. Commissioner, International Boundary and <br />Water Commission, and Bureau of Reclamation <br />officials reported the results of the third year of <br />operation of the bypass channel, ending Novem- <br />ber 15, 1968. The following table summarizes <br />some pertinent statistics from the federal reports. <br /> <br />MINUTE NO. 218 OPERATION <br /> <br />Year previous 1st year <br />to agreemem 11-16-65 <br />(1964 calendar to <br />year) 11-1.<-66 <br /> <br />2nd year <br />11-16.66 <br />to <br />11-Ii.67 <br /> <br />3rd year <br />11-16.67 <br />to <br />Il.Ii.68 <br /> <br />Wcllron-Mohawk <br />drainage dis- <br />charge, ae. ft. ____ 181,000 <br />Salt load, tOn5_______ 1,251,000 <br />Di\"erted around <br />1\.lorelos Dam, <br />:Ie. ft. mmm"________ <br />Bypass during <br />mirumum treary <br />order, ae. ft. "___ <br />Makeup from stor- <br />age re1ease, ae. ft. <br />(approx.) ._____._ <br />A \'g. salinity of <br />ri\-"er at nonherly <br />boundary, ppm___ 1,310 1,230 1,210 1,190 <br /> <br />The above table shows that during the first <br /> <br />three years of operations of Minute 218 the <br /> <br />required makenp from storage has cost users in <br /> <br />216,900 210.530 219,500 <br />1,388,000 1,318,000 1,314,000 <br />105,830 99,100 103.900 <br />58,660 53,390 52,600 <br />15,000 35,000 47.300 <br /> <br />35 <br />