Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1060 <br /> <br />where HDR = headgate diversion requirement, <br /> GCU = gross consumptive use, <br /> EP = effective precipitation, <br /> CL = canal losses, <br /> LL = lateral losses, and <br /> FL = farm losses. <br /> <br />Table 7 shows the headgate diversion requirements for a full water <br />supply for irrigation seasons 1949-70 based on an irrigated acreage of 6,000 <br />acres. Values from 1949 to 1965 are from Bureau of Reclamation .!,omi>\i~ae,iqns. " <br />Subsequent values are from computations made by Water Board staff members <br />using the Same procedure as the Bureau so they will be comparable. <br /> <br />Table 8 has been prepared utilizing headgate diversion data from <br />Table 1 and computed requirements from Table 7. This table shows months when <br />diversions were less than requirements during the 22-year period 1949-70. During <br />the months of April, September and October when consumptive use is relatively <br />low, the company-owned wells may have furnished enough water to alleviate short- <br />ages in most instances. However, it would be difficult for these wells alone to <br />make up the shortages that occur so frequently in July and August. <br /> <br />It will be noted from Table 8 that 1954 and 1963 were the critical <br />years in the 1949-70 period since there was some shortage in every month of the <br />irrigation Season in those years. The total computed shortages were 9,500 ac-ft <br />in 1954 and 11,200 ac-ft in 1963. <br /> <br />Figure 3 is a histogram depicting graphically by months the relations <br />between average headgate diversions, average headgate requirements, "realisticll <br />headgate requirements and comparing these quantities with supplies that would <br />be available to the ditch if both decrees were diverted all of the time. <br /> <br />The term "realistic requirement" is used here to indicate a headgate <br />requirement above the average and below the absolute maximum. On the assump- <br />tion that no ditch can be guaranteed a full water supply 100% of the time and <br />that any ditch can operate with something less than a full supply for short <br />periods, the "realistic requirement" was computed as the upper quartile of <br />values listed in Table 7. A requirement such as this is much more realistic <br />than an average requirement in determining the adequacy of decrees or in ar- <br />riving at volumetric limitations on the quantity of water needed by the ditch <br />on either a monthly or a seasonal basis. <br /> <br />It is evident from Figure 3 that on a seasonal basis, average historic <br />diversions have been a little larger than the average seasonal requirements. For <br />the months of April, May and June average diversions exceed average requirements, <br />but for July, August, September and October the reverse has been true. Thus, a <br />better regulated supply would help the situation. Historically, an additional <br />supply has been provided by company-owned and shareholder-owned wells. <br /> <br />It is also evident from Figure 3 that the 1867 decree for 13.4 cfs <br />does not provide sufficient water to meet even average headgate requirements <br />for April, the month when headgate requirements are lowest. On the other hand, <br />the amount of 7,850 ac-ft per month available when both the 1867 and 1887 decrees <br />are diverted provides 3,500 ac-ft more than the realistic requirement of 4,350 ac-ft <br /> <br />- 20 - <br />