Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />SUBSTANTIATING MATERIALS <br /> <br />accessibility of construction sites, right-of-way requirements, avail- <br />ability of construction materials, and other pertinent factors. CanaJ. <br />and lateraJ. designs were based on earth lining in all sections where <br />seepage from these struotures would affeot the irrigable lands. Pre- <br />cast concrete pipe was used for siphons. Standard types of canaJ. struc- <br />tures were provided where needed. Concrete pipe culverts were used for <br />bridge orossings. A 3-year oonstruotion period would be advisable. <br /> <br />King Consolidated Diversion Works <br /> <br />The existing wood and oonorete structure would be replaoed with a <br />permanent concrete and steel structure of adequate capacity. The new <br />struoture would be located on the same site as the existing works and <br />would be construoted to handle only a portion of the river flow. The <br />diversion works would include a oonorete ogee spillway 40 feet long, a <br />oanaJ. headworke 10 feet wide and 62 feet long oontrolled by 8- by 10- <br />foot radiaJ. gates. A fish soreen would be provided at the headworks. <br /> <br />~ng Consolidated Canal Enlargement <br /> <br />The existing King Consolidated Canal would be enlarged from the <br />diversion works on the Pine River, near Bayf'ield, Colo., to the tUrnout <br />for the Ridge Canal. The capao:l.ty would be inoreased trom about 95 to <br />165 Second-feet. The enlarged portion of the oanal would be approx- <br />imate~ 11.5 miles long and wouJ,d consist of 6 miles of unlined earth <br />section, 5 miles of earth lined section, 0.13 mile of siphons, 0.18 mile <br />of concrete benoh flUllle, and 0.15 mile of free-flow conorete pipe. The <br />canaJ. seotion would be in materiaJ. ranging from the heavy clay soils <br />derived from shales to raw shales and in some cases solid sandstone. <br /> <br />Ridge Canal <br /> <br />The Ridge Canal would convey water from the turnout at the end of <br />the enlarged portion of the King Consolidated Canal to proJeot lands <br />extending southward. The oanal would be 22.7 miles long and would oon- <br />sist of 7.9 miles of unlined earth seotion, 12.6 miles of' earth-lined <br />sect;1on, 1.5 miles 01' siphons, and 0.7 mile of chutes and drops. The <br />oa.pa.oity ot the canal would vary trom 55 to 5 seoond-feet. The oanal <br />would be in overlying heavy clay soils and the under~ing shales. As <br />much of the canal is locatild on ridges, the shaJ.e is either exposed or <br />at shallow depths. ..- <br /> <br />Salt Creek Lateral. <br /> <br />The Salt Creek lateraJ. would extend westward from a turnout at <br />mile 7.1 of the Ridge Canal to projeot lands in the SaJ.t Creek drainage <br />area. The lateral would be about 11.9 miles long and WOl.ld have a <br />capacity ranging trom 15 to 5 second-feet. It would consist of 7.4 <br />miles of unlined earth seotion and 4.5 miles of earth-lined canal. <br /> <br />7 <br />