Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />r r . - <br />~Ul~ <br /> <br />Coordinate Project Functions <br /> <br />in the plan of development that would yield additional benefits of <br />$94,600, making total annual fish and wildlife enhancement benefits <br />of $292,700. Table 9 is a summarization of the benefits by category. <br /> <br />The Fish and Wildlife Service estimated that the capital <br />cost of its proposed 15,765-acre wildlife management area would <br />be $2,265,000 vith annual operation, maintenance, and replacement <br />expenses of $37,000. The land requirements would consist of <br />8,545 acres of normal Reclamation fee title rights-of-way, <br />3,520 acres specifically for fish and wildlife to be acquired <br />in fee title, and 3,700 acres normally Reclamation flood easement <br />lands vhich will also be acquired in fee title. <br /> <br />Existing Jackson Lake is to be acquired and operated to <br />jointly serve the functions of fish and wildlife and recreation. <br />The capital cost of $125,000 for rehabilitation and the annual <br />OM&R expense of $18,000 are to be shared equally by the two <br />functions. <br /> <br />Some of the fish and wildlife measures will jointly serve the <br />purposes of mitigation and local and national enhancement. In <br />accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation <br />Act, Public Law 89-72, the costs of fish and wildlife mitigation <br />measures are treated as joint costs and the capital costs of <br />measures leading to local fish and wildlife benefits--except <br />those related to waterfowl use like nesting, resting, and winter- <br />ing--are to be cost-shared equally by the Federal Government and the <br />non-Federal administering entity. In addition to costs specifically <br />incurred for fish and wildlife measures, a share of joint dam and <br />reservoir capital and annual costs is allocated to the function. <br /> <br />The allocations of capital and annual costs are presented <br />subsequently in Part X of this planning report. <br /> <br />RECREATION <br /> <br />Two reports by the National Park Service are appended to this <br />planning report. The first recreation report presented a plan of <br />development to serve the initial anticipated public use. The second <br />recreation report projected the increased visitor days and additional <br />incremental costs and benefits that might result when ultimate <br />recreation use is reached at the Narrows Reservoir. The incremental <br /> <br />45 <br />