My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05529
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05529
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:18:45 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:05:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.700
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - Homestake Project
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
10/29/1982
Author
various
Title
Documents related to the Homestake Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />344~ <br /> <br />(a) Provide Population Trends For The Development Area And Source <br />Development Area; <br /> <br />As noted earlier, the State Demographer has observed that from 1970 to <br />1980, the annual compounded rate of growth, based upon census figures, <br />has been 4.7% per annum for Colorado Springs and 7.8% per annum for <br />Aurora. <br /> <br />Census data demonstrates the trend of increasing populations in each <br />community. <br /> <br /> Colorado Springs Aurora <br /> Population % Increase Population % Increase <br />1950 45,472 11,421 <br /> 54.4% 325.1% <br />1960 70,194 48,548 <br /> 93.1% 54.4% <br />1970 135,517 74,974 <br /> 58.8% 111.5% <br />1980 215,150 158,588 <br /> <br />Supported by the growth increases in previous decades, and since Colorado <br />Springs had a 58.8% increase from 1970 to 1980 and Aurora a 111.5% <br />increase for the same period, it must be concluded that the growth rate <br />is a strong long term rate. <br /> <br />In contrast to 4.7% per annum and 7.8% per annum growth rates for Colorado <br />Springs and Aurora respectively for 1970 to 1980, the Cities are using <br />conservative annual growth rates. This is based upon a consensus of <br />regional planning agencies that growth will moderate. Accordingly, <br />Colorado Springs' projections are based upon an approximate 3.2% per <br />annum rate; Aurora's projections are based upon a 3.1% per annum rate <br />(see Attachments 2 and 3). Population trends in the source development <br />area are not provided as there is no current population in the area, and <br />since the area is designated a wilderness, it will not be developed. <br /> <br />(b) Specify The Predominant Types Of Developments To Be Served By <br />The Proposed Extension Of The Water Collection System; <br /> <br />The predominant types of developments to be served in the cities of <br />Colorado Springs and Aurora are limited exclusively to residential, <br />commercial, industrial, municipal and.military or national security use. <br /> <br />(c) Specify What Percentage Of The Design Capacity The Current <br />System Is Now Operating; <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.