Laserfiche WebLink
<br />344CJ <br /> <br />(d) Specify The Excess Capacity Of Each Treatment System And <br />Distribution Or Collection Network In The Community Or <br />Development Area And Source Development Area; <br /> <br />The average annual yield for Homestake Phase I is 28;000 acre feet. The <br />Missouri Tunnel and Homestake Tunnel have been constructed to accommodate <br />both the Phase I yield and the expected Phase II yield. Additionally, <br />Homestake Reservoir and East Slope storage and delivery facilities have <br />been constructed to accommodate the entire yield under ultimate development. <br /> <br />Total excess supply over demand in the other water collection systems is <br />reflected for ea~l community in Attachments 2 & 3. Obviously, the <br />excess supply is projected to diminish annually until approximately 1994 <br />When water supplied from this project must be available. Capacity of <br />treatment and distribution systems within the Cities should not be <br />deemed relevant since they are not within the borders of Eagle County <br />and are not related to the need for additional water supply. In any <br />case, the Cities will maintain adequate treatment and distribution <br />capac1 ty in order to properly utilize the water produced by Phase II. <br /> <br />(e) Provide An Inventory Of Total Commitments Already Made For <br />Current Water Services; <br /> <br />Total commitments made for the sale' of water, although not within Eagle <br />County are provided herein. As of July 1982, Colorado Springs had <br />57,404 residential customers, 6,933 commercial customers, 3 contract <br />customers and 82 other, including inter-departmental and irrigation <br />customers. The City of Aurora had 37,845 residential customers 3,319 <br />commercial customers and one contract customer. Aurora is committed to <br />provide 2,500 af to Pueblo and ultimately 3,100 af to the Roxborough <br />District. <br /> <br />(f) Detail The Operational Efficiency Of Each Existing System <br />In The Development Area And Source Development Area; <br /> <br />Concerning the efficiencies of overall water supply systems, Aurora <br />estimates 10% of total aggregate supply is lost through reservoir evapora- <br />tion, transportation and system operation losses. Colorado Springs <br />estimates 10% of its raw supply is lost through evaporation, reservoir <br />losses, and transportation losses. Less than 5% is lost in the distri- <br />bution system, including annual operation and flushing of fire hydrants. <br />Both Cities continue active inspection and maintenance programs and have <br />low seepage losses in the distribution systems. <br /> <br />(g) Detail The Source, Rights, And Quality Of Existing Water <br />Supply Which Shall Include A Detailed Statement Of The Proposed <br />Project's Impact On The Total Dissolved Solids and Hardness of <br />the Eagle River Measured At Dowd Junction And Dotsero And Of <br />The Colorado River And The Roaring Fork River Measured At the <br />Garfield/Eagle County Line Respectively. <br /> <br />8 <br />