My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05451
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05451
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:18:24 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:02:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407
Description
Platte River Basin - River Basin General Publications
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
5/2/1989
Author
Colorado DNR
Title
Metropolitan Cooperation - The Supply and Delivery of Water
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'OOO~~6 <br /> <br />IV. The Imoact of the Two Forks Decision <br /> <br />A. Incentives for metrooolitan coooeration with Two Forks. A <br />framework exists for the joint development of projects which could serve <br />the metropolitan area. The Metropolitan Water Development Agreement was <br />the institutional vehicle by which the Denver Water Board and the <br />suburban water providers could plan and develop any number of water <br />projects. The Two Forks participation agreement was an outgrowth of this <br />enabling document. <br /> <br />The Two Forks permit has been justified and advocated, at least in <br />part, as a catalyst to further metropolitan cooperation. With Two Forks, <br />there would be additional water supplies available to a number of <br />entities. But, Denver would certainly gain disproportionately compared <br />with its need. As a result, it would have a marketable commodity that <br />could be shared with suburban communities in exchange for their support <br />of Denver-provided metropolitan services (e.g., Denver General). <br /> <br />B. Incentives for metrooolitan coooeration without Two Forks. <br />Denver has considerable leverage over the metropolitan area with regard <br />to water. Importantly, Denver controls valuable water rights and has the <br />necessary infrastructure to serve an area substantially larger than the <br />City and County of Denver. In large part, this is because this system <br />was envisioned as more than simply a Denver City system. However, <br />without Denver's cooperation, Denver could make it very difficult for the <br />less water-independent suburbs to obtain future water. <br /> <br />Denver still holds valuable water cards even without Two Forks. The <br />question is: what is there incentive to play? The suburban interests <br />would like to see the 60,000 acre feet of interim supplies developed. In <br />their view, they see this as an opportunity to which they are arguably <br />entitled despite Denver's control of the water rights. They would say <br />that these rights were acquired under the guise of Denver providing a <br />metropolitan supply and that the suburbs relied upon these promises. <br />Denver, on the other hand, sees these supplies as the security it needs <br />to insure that water is available for future build-out of the City and <br />County of Denver including the Platte Valley and the airport. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.