My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05450
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05450
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:18:24 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:02:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.114.I
Description
Dolores Participating Project
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
2/1/1995
Author
USDOI-BOR
Title
Draft Environmental Assessment - Proposal to Modify Operation of McPhee Reservoir and Acquire Additional Water for Fish and Wildlife Purposes
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, ' <br /> <br />STRUCTURAL ALTERNATIVES TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WATER: <br /> <br />Increase the active capacity of McPhee Reservoir by inereasinllthe hcillht of McPhee Dam - <br />McPhee Dam could be raised 10 increase lhe ma.ximum reservoir elevation above 6,924 feet. Implementing lhis <br />alternative would require purchasing and/or relocating of most of lhe lawn of Dolores. TIlis aClion would <br />require Congressional authori~tion. <br /> <br />Increase the active capacity of McPhee Reservoir by lowering the intake elevatioll of the diversion <br />points _ This would require draining the reservoir below the minimum pool elevation for an extended period of <br />time. This could be more expensive than raising the dam because of physical construction consrraints. II would <br />adversely affect recreational opportunities associated with the reservoir and could adversely effect the reservoir <br />fishery. It would require Congressional authorization. <br /> <br />Provide water from inactive storage in McPhee Reservoir using pumps. Pumping plants could be <br />constructed adjacent to Great Cut Dike Pumping Plant and the Dolores Tunnel to deliver water to lhe existing <br />intake structures. This could adversely affect future years' water supply and be expensive to operate and <br />maintain the pumping plants. It would likely adversely effect reservoir recreation, and may adversely effect the <br />reservoir fishery. It would also require Congressional authorization. <br /> <br />fmprove additional portions of tbe ~C water delivery system to conserve water and reduce <br />salinity, ia return for water saved - Only those portions of the MVIC system that are economically feasible for <br />salinity control purposes are presently.included in the Dolores Project. Seepage from other MVfC canals has <br />increased. Reclamation could line those MVfC canals in return for the saved water. Reclamation's use of saved <br />water would require a change of water right by the state and constrUction would also require Congressioaal <br />authorization. <br /> <br />Release Project water for the Dove Creek area full-service lands to tbe Dolores River througb <br />McPbee Dam and pump tbe water from tbe river near Bradfield Bridge - Project water for the Dove Creek <br />full-service area could be released from McPhee Dam and pumped back to the Project dellvery system from near <br />Bradfield Bridge. ConstrUction, operation, and maiorenance costs of this alternative could be hi!!h. It would . <br />require modification of the automated control system of the dam and of the Great Cut Pumping Plant. It would <br />require Congressional authorization. <br /> <br />Construct Plateau Creek, Bear Creek, or Beaver Creek Reservoirs to provide additional Project <br />water storage. DWCD owns conditional water storage rights on Plateau, Bear, and Beaver Creeks, all tributary <br />to the Dolores River above McPhee Dam. Small reservoirs could be constructed on any of these tributaries and <br />operated to increase the Dolores Project water supply and provide additional water for release downstream. For <br />example, Plateau Creek Reservoir was previously evaluated as a pumpback storage unit. Construction, operation <br />and maintenance costs of any of these reservoirs, except Plateau Creek, would be high. These dam/reservoirs <br />would require Congressional authorization and negotiadon with DWCD for the storage rights. <br /> <br />OPERATIONAL ALTERNATIVES TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WATER: <br /> <br />Purchase Groundhog Reservoir from MVIC and designate all or part of its water for release <br />tbrough McPhee Dam . Groundhog Reservoir is located in the Dolores River Basin upstream of McPhee <br />Reservoir. lu water is used by MVIC when the flows of the Dolores River are inadequate. Under an existing <br />agreement between OWeD and MV1C, at least 3000 acre. feet of water is released annually from Groundhog <br />reservoir during July, August, and September. However, MVle would not.likely be a willing seller at a <br />reasonable price. This alternative could increase MV1C's demand for Project water, increasing the frequency and <br />magnitude of Project water shonages. ^ safety of dims evaluation of Groundhog Dam would be required. A <br />change of water right would need 10 be granled by the state. <br /> <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.