Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ThelnteriorDeparonenfs <br />decisiOll on ltie Glen <br />Canyon Dam 8S called for <br />restricted water releases <br />to 1l01Ect do\\l1stream <br />resources. Operations at <br />several oltier SlCMP <br />:facilities also have been <br />I <br />modified arllill be <br />modffiedin ltienearfuture <br />toaddress en~ronmentll <br /> <br />concerns. <br /> <br />Glen Canyon Dam and Power <br />Plant <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Glt:n Canyon Dam and power plant <br />is located on the ColOTado River in <br />nonhem Arizona. It is operated by <br />Reclamation to meet Lower Colorado <br />River Basin water storage and delivery <br />requirements. These arc codified in a <br />variet\' of docuements knO\\TI collectivel\' <br />. . <br />as the Law of the River. As the largest <br />SLeAlIP generating resource, Glen <br />Canyon Dam represents about two-thirds <br />of the total SLCAlIP capacity and three <br />quarters of the energy. <br /> <br />In the past, Glen Canyon Dam was <br />used primarily to generate peaking power. <br />While this operational choice made the <br />power generated at Glen Canyon more <br />flexible, and therefore more valuable, it <br />also caused significant hourly and daily <br />fluctuations in water releases. These <br />fluctuations caused concern bccause of <br />their potential effects on the downstream <br />em-ironment. In December 1982, Recla- <br />matIOn began Phase I of the Glen Canyon <br />Environmental Studics (GCES) to respond <br />to the concerns of environmental and <br />recreational interests regarding Glen <br />Canyon Dam operations. In June 19tU~, <br />Phase II of the GC ES was initiated to <br />address economic impacts [a power <br />customers, along with other concerns. <br /> <br />In July 1989, the Secreuryofthe <br />Interior announced that Reclamation <br />would prepare an Envlfonmentallmpact <br />Statement (EIS) on the effects of Glen <br />Canyon Dam operations on the dO\\TI- <br />stream ennronment. The EIS record of <br />decision was signed by the Secretary of <br />the Interior on October 9,1996,- The <br />Interior Department's decision on the Glen <br /> <br />. Orwration of Gltn Can)'nn Dam, Final EIS, <br />U,S. Department of the Inlerior, Bureau of <br />I Re-=Iarnation. FES95-8, daled March 21, 1995 <br />Record of Decision. dated (ktober 9.1996, <br /> <br />Canvon Dam EIS called for restricted <br />waler releases to protect downstream <br />resources. changing the long-term operal- <br />109 criteria by reducmg hourly and daily <br />fluctuations in water relt:ases. This <br />affected the magnitude and timmg of <br />e1ectnc power available under a range of <br />possible water condttlons. <br /> <br />The decision also mcluded general <br />pro\isions which would allow Western to <br />respond to power system emergencies by <br />temporarily deviating from nonnally <br />constramed powerplant operations <br />FolJo\\ing the record of deCISion. the <br />Operating Criteria and 1997 Annual Plan <br />of Operations for Glen Canyon Dam. <br />approved by Secretary Bruce B.Jbbitt on <br />February 24. 1997, included similar <br />provision for emergencies to address <br />system emergenCIes and load.following <br />conditions. <br /> <br />The degree to which Western can <br />use hydroelectric gener.Jtion to respond to <br />power system emergencies and to satisty <br />load.follo\\ing obhgations IS an important <br />consideration In the Replacement Re. <br />sources Process. With this ability, capac- <br />ity from Glen Canyon Dam can be used to <br />serve load under limited emergency <br />situations. thereby allO\\ing Western to <br />claim a higher avai!.Jble short-tenn onpeak <br />capacity at Glen Canyon. Replacement <br />power can then be obtained at lower cost <br />on the bulk power market than would be <br />the case in the absence of these erner. <br />gency and system regulation procedures. <br /> <br />Other SLCA Integrated Projects <br />Resources <br /> <br />In addItion to Glen Canyon Dam. <br />operations at several other SLeMP <br />facilities also have been modified or will <br />be modified in the ncar future to address <br />ennronmental concerns These facilities <br />mclude the Flanling Gorge Danl and <br />