Laserfiche WebLink
<br />power plant (northeastern Utah) and the <br />Aspmall Unit (western Colorado) of the <br />CRSP, the Upper and Lower ,\10Iina <br />powerplants of the Coli bran Project <br />(western Colorado), and possibly the <br />Elephant Butte power plant of the Rio <br />Grande Project (New ;\1exico). Any <br />operational changes to reduce the hourly <br />variation in water releases through these <br />power plants could further reduce the <br />total capacity available to SLeAlIP firm <br />power customers. <br /> <br />SLCAIIP Electric Power <br />Marketing EIS <br /> <br />In addition to serving Reclamation <br />project use loads, \Vestem markets <br />surplus SLCMP firm power through <br />long.term wholesale firm electric senice <br />contracts to eligible public power utilities <br />These contracts identifY each customer's <br />share of the total SLIP conunitmenl level. <br />The SLIP comnlltment level was recently <br />reestablished through a public process that <br />concluded \\ith the completion of <br />Western's Electric Power Marketing EIS <br />(EPM-EIS) in January 1996. Imtially, <br />Western began the EIS process to <br />determine the environmental impacts of <br />Western.s then-proposed changes to the <br />level of long-term firm electric capacity <br />and energy sales from the SLCMP. <br /> <br />The EPf\.1.EIS concluded that most <br />impacts to natural and cultural resources <br />would result from hydropower operations <br />rather than from commitment levels. This <br />is due to the fact that commitment levels <br />are only weakly linked to hydropower <br />operations. The EPM-EIS recommended <br />that selection of a high energy and high <br />capacity conurutmcnt level. referred to as <br />the Post-1989 level. This firm power <br />commitment le\-e! establishes an upper <br />hnut for Western to provide capacity and <br />energy. This commitment level. outlined <br />m customer contracts \.,.Jtich expire in <br /> <br />2004. was approved on October 17, 1996 <br />when the EP~1.EIS Record of Decision <br />was Signed by Western.s Administrator, <br />J.M Shafer. <br /> <br />Current Western Power <br />Purchasing Practices <br /> <br />The Replacement Resources Pro. <br />cess relates to Western.s power purchas- <br />mg authorities and practices. Western has <br />the authomy to purchase power to comple- <br />ment the variable nature of Federal <br />hydroelectric power generated at Recla- <br />mation projects. When establishing long- <br />term firm capacity and energy commit- <br />ment levels, \\'estem considers many <br />relevant factors, such as hydroelectric <br />generator capability, transmission limita- <br />tions, annual snowpack conditions and <br />resen.oir end-of-month target storage <br />conditions. <br /> <br />\Vestern regularly purchases power <br />on the spot market on a short-term basiS <br />because of shortfalls in hydroelectric <br />generation, variations in the market price <br />of power, and to relieve transmission <br />limitations. This is a standard operating <br />practice of electric utilities and provides <br />Western flexibility to respond to customer <br />needs during Urnes of varying electricity <br />demand <br /> <br />Contract Amendment on <br />Replacement Power Purchases <br /> <br />Western has worked with a group of <br />Its SLeMP firm-power customer repre- <br />sentati\.es [0 develop and implement <br />contract amendments that acconunodate <br />replacement power decisions, and to <br />address other Impacts of changed opera- <br />Uons at federal power resources. These <br />contract amendments establish a prudent <br />long-term commitment level of sustain. <br />ablf hydropo......er (SHP) and address the <br />replacement of unavailable power at GCD <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />~ Western has worked with a <br />glOOpofitsSlCMPfirm- <br />powll'cuslllmer <br />representatives to develop <br />and implementcontr.d <br />ilI11Il'1mtsthat <br />~Ie <br />replacement power <br />decisioos. <br /> <br />D <br />