My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05404
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05404
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:23:02 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:00:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8050.100
Description
Section D General Statewide Issues - State Policies - General
State
CO
Date
1/1/2001
Author
Governors Commission
Title
Agricultural Water Policy Development - Reference Materials - Colorados Legacy to its Children
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />STRENGTHEN THE CONSERVATION <br />EASEMENT TAX CREDIT <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />In today'!; real estate <br />market, Colorado's <br />land Is seUing at top <br />dollar In many <br />communities. Faced <br />with low commodity <br />prices. farmers and <br />ranchers near urban <br />areas are all tOO often <br />forced to sell their <br />land to developers_ <br />State law provides tax <br />IncentIves for <br />landowners v,.-ho <br />donate conservation <br />easements. which <br />permanently prohibit development of <br />their land. to government entitles or <br />charitable organizatiOns. However. <br />these Incentives are capped at <br />S 100,000. and often pale in campar. <br />Ison to the land's market value. <br /> <br />In addition. landO\l"T1ers often <br />face financial hurdles to putting an <br />easement on theIr prOp€ny. <br />Farmers and ranchers must work <br />with la.....yers. estate planners. <br />surveyors and assessors to create <br />the easement. ,..'hile also meeting <br />1 R.$. requirements for the <br />recognitiOn of the easement The <br />Comml~ion believes that the <br />legislature should enhance the value <br />of state conser,ration incenUves to <br />provide a greater reason for <br />landov.-ners to preserve their land <br /> <br />Current state ]aw allows <br />landowners to sell their conservation <br />easement tax credits. giving farmers <br />and ranchers \\1th little tax liability a <br />cash incemi\e to preserve their land <br />The impacts of this market for credits <br /> <br />are nOt known. In pan because no <br />Information exchange has emerged <br />10 link sellers of a tax credit with <br />buyers of the credit, In addition. <br />state Jaw prohibits an Indl\1dual <br />taxpayer from purchasing more than <br />one credit. further stifling a liquid <br />market. The Commission believes <br />that minor legislative changes will <br />encourage the development of a <br />market These changes should <br />Include allowing corporate and <br />Indh.1dual taxpayers to purchase <br />more than one credit. directing the <br />Department of Revenue to create a <br />transferable ceruncale of value and <br />directing Revenue to publish an <br />annual report that tracks the use of <br />the credits, <br /> <br />For instance. a rancher places a <br />conser....atlon easement on his land <br />and receh'es a corresponding tax <br />credit worth 550.000 However. if <br />cattle prices are low and the ranch <br />generates no taxable income. then <br />the tax credit Is \vonhless to the <br /> <br />,~ <br />.. <br />, <br /> <br />rancher. But a <br />different local business <br />may face a 5300.000 <br />tax liability and want <br />to purchase the <br />rancher's tax credit at <br />a discount rate. The <br />rancher might sell his <br />S50.OOO tax credit for <br />540.000, The business <br />would purchase <br />S300,000 worth of tax <br />credits for S240,000. <br />thus saving S60.OOO. <br />The rancher receives <br />cash benefit.s for <br />permanently preserving his land: the <br />business benefits by reducing Its !ax <br />Ilablllty and: the state beneflts by <br />protecting ranch land. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Commission recommends <br />that: <br /> <br />The value of the conservation <br />easement tax credit/refund should <br />be increased to 5500,000 <br /> <br />Landowners should be allowed to <br />include a reasonable portion of <br />their transaction costs In their <br />conservation easement credits <br /> <br />A corporate or individual taxpayer <br />should be permitted to purchase <br />more than one easement tax <br />credit <br /> <br />The Depanment of Revenue and <br />Depanment of :\atural Resources <br />create a cenlflcate of value for the <br />ta>; credit and compile an annual <br />report detailmg the amount of <br />credits used and the acres <br />preserved ... <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.