Laserfiche WebLink
<br />c' <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />-8- <br /> <br />REIMBURSEMENT AND COST-SHARING <br /> <br />The Westel"'n States Watel'" Council commends the Watel'" Resoul"'Ces <br /> <br />Council fol'" the recognition that CUl"'rent relmbul"'Sement and cost-shal"'ing <br /> <br />poltcles be reviewed at an eal"'ly date. The Watel'" Resoul"Ces Council is <br /> <br />encoul"'aged to conduct such a I"'evlew in a fOl"'mal mannel'" and as eal"'ly as <br /> <br />possible so that unlfol"'mlty can be achieved by the val"'lous reviewing agencies. <br /> <br />. It ts I"'equested that the Individual states and the Westel"'n States Watel'" Council <br /> <br />'be Involved and parl:icipate In such a review and have ar1'opporl:unity to com"'; <br /> <br />ment on any suggested modifications that may come of such a review. <br />I <br /> <br />REVIEW OF STANDAR,DS <br /> <br />With the undel"'standlng that any new tool must be evaluated and often <br /> <br />modified if It Is to propel"'ly pel"'fol"'m the task fol'" which it was designed. it <br /> <br />ts suggested that the Watel'" Resoul"'Ces Counctl conduct a thorough revtew and <br /> <br />, analysis of the standal"'ds that are eventually adopted and Implemented aftel'" <br />they have been applted and used fol'" a pel"'tod of ttme. Such I"'evlew should involve <br /> <br />all using agencies and states. with the Intent of modtfying the Standal"'ds. where <br /> <br />appr-opl"tate. to refine the procedul"'es and insul"'e that they al"'e as good a <br /> <br />method as can be agreed upon to best evaluate prospective projects. <br /> <br /> $ <br /> I" <br /> " <br /> " <br />", <br />.-; <br /> , <br /> ! <br /> <br />.' , <br />.'! <br /> <br />, <br />1 <br />" <br /> <br />, <br />" <br /> <br />~i <br /> <br />;1; <br />I' <br />, <br /> <br />'~I <br />I' <br />l;;~ <br />j\ <br />j: <br />,; <br /> <br />, <br />J <br />