Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />'" <br />r-. <br />if) - <br />N <br />o <br />Q <br /> <br />~ Development costs for ground water from the upper confined aquifer in a depth range of 1000 <br />feet to 2500 feet are estimated at $50/af/yr pumping twelve months, and up to $80/af/yr for <br />pumping four. months each year, based on an average transmissivity of 250,000 gpd/f~ How- <br />ever, these water development costs are highly dependent on aquifer transmissivity, which in <br />.' turn, has been estimated for the San Luis Valley from minimal amounts of site-specific data. <br /> <br />.' .t:.~ <br />0", ./u <br /> <br />Ground water in the deep confined aquifer, below a depth of about 2500 feet. in the <br />central portion of the Valley, is expected to show total dissolved solids (TDS) concentra- <br />tions greater than 3000 mg/l. Above a depth of 2500 feet, ground water is expected to show <br />TDS averaging less than 500 mg/l. <br /> <br />Near the rift-related fault zones which form the east and west edges of the Alamosa <br />Horst, and in several other places in the Valley, high heat content and low to moderate <br />production rates (up to 100 gpm) appear to be feasible from wells drilled deeper than <br />approximate ly 3000 fee~ It is expected, however, that water quality from the rift-related <br />geothermal system would be quite poor (TDS ranging from 3000 mg/l to as high as 10,000 <br />mg/l). <br /> <br />In the foothills of the San Juan mountain range, the upper 2000 feet of the Conejos <br />Formation constitutes a thick, near-surface, and probably unconfined aquifer. It is prob- <br />able that wells having acceptable water quality (less than 1000 mg/l) can be constructed in <br />this aquifer with production rates of at least 500 gpm. In the Rio Grande fan area, it <br />appears likely that wells could be constructed with higher production rates (up to 2000 gpm) <br />and acceptable water quality in the upper confined aquifer above a depth of about 2000 fee~ <br />Institutional aspects of developing either of these two aqUifer locations would be a primary <br />concern. <br /> <br />__Compilation and. synthesis of existing geologic and geophysical data, together with <br />analysis of new satellite imagery, has made possible one of the most extensive evaluations <br />of Jhe geologic structure that has been performed by any entity for the San Luis Valley <br />aquifers. This evaluation shows a complex layered sequence of unconsolidated sediment <br />deposits, extensive faulting criss-crossing the Valley, and possible wide shear zones cross- <br />ing the Valley from the San Juan Mountains to the Sangre de Cristos. The complexity of the <br />geologic structure has led to the conclusion that any modeling of the Valley would depend on <br />estimates of physical aquifer parameters that are highly subjectiv~ Thus, any Valley-wide <br />modeling results with existing data may be subject to significant changes in the futur~ <br /> <br />Several locations within the Valley have been identified where there is upward leakage <br />within the deep confined aquifer and the shallow confined aqUifer. If this leakage between <br />the aquifers occurs throughout most of the San Luis Valley, this may indicate a tributary <br />condition for the shallow confined aquifer (above a depth of 2500 feet), and possibly for <br />the deep confined aquifer which lies beneath most of the Valle~ <br /> <br />In summary, the Phase I studies conclude that it is not economically feasible to <br />develop water for irrigation from the deep (below 3000 feet) confined aquifer due to rela- <br />tively low transmissivity and poor water qualit~ For the shallow confined aquifer between <br />1000 and 2500 feet, it is also concluded that development of water for irrigation would not <br />be economically feasible at this time. For the confined aquifer, no definite conclusions <br />can be reached from Phase I studies regarding the institutional issues of tributariness of <br />the aquifer and potential harm to existing water rights. <br />