My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05362
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05362
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:18:02 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:58:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8549.100
Description
Rio Grande Water Supply Study
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
7/1/1987
Title
San Luis Valley Confined Aquifer Study - Newsletter No. 4
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />SAN <br />LUIS VALLEY <br />CONFINED AQUIFER STUDY <br />Newsletter No. 4 <br />JulylQ87 <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION. <br /> <br />The purpose of this new' letter is to update the Advisory Committee and the public <br />regarding the progress of the San Luis Valley Confined Aquifer Study. This study was <br />initiated in late March 1986 under the auspices of the Colorado Water Resources and Power <br />Development Authority and will be completed in August, 1987. The'local sponsor of the <br />project is the San Luis Valley Water Conservancy District. The consulting firm is HRS Water <br />Consultants, Inc. The purpose of this study is to assess the physical, institutional, and <br />economic feasibility of water development from the deep confined aquifer system of the San <br />Luis Valley. Following are the conclusions and recommendations from the Phase I investiga- <br />tions. <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />Early in Phase I it was concluded that these studies should focus first on the physical <br />and economic feasibility of ground water development and should lay aside the institutional <br />issues until more physical data could be assembled for the confined aqUifer. This led to <br />the decision to concentrate initially on the confined aquifer system which lies below a <br />depth of 3000 feet, where institutional questions might be of less concern. <br /> <br />Reliable data available for characterizing the deep confined aquifer system are primar- <br />ily geophysical logs and other geophysical information from oil and gas exploration efforts. <br />Data from water wells in the deep confined aquifer are very sparse and are highly site- <br />specific, yielding information primarily on the rift-related fault zones in the Alamosa <br />Horst/Baca Graben areas. In this study, only one water well deeper than 3000 feet was <br />successfully tested and logged. Water wells shallower than 2000 feet in the Valley yield <br />usable information for characterizing the upper confined aquifer, but the depths from which <br />the wells draw water are often not known. There are 11,881 wells in the Valley which are <br />registered with the State Engineer's Office, but only 28 were found to be deeper than 2000 <br />feet, and only 6 were found to be deeper than 3000 feet. <br /> <br />Virtually all potential demand for water in the San Luis Valley is for irrigation - it <br />has been estimated that some 300,000 acre-feet (af) alone could be used either as supple- <br />mental water or for new lands. Under present market conditions. $15 to $20 per acre-foot <br />per year ($/af/yr) is the average which farmers can afford to pay for supplemental irriga- <br />tion water in the Valley. Under the most optimistic market conditions. the agricultural <br />sector could possibly afford to pay up to $50/af/yr. . .... ,: <br />" . ,';\ .' <br /> <br />The cost to develop 100,000 af/yr of ground water from the deep confined aq'~'lfer is . <br />estimated at $21O/af/yr pumping twelve months each year, and $370/af/yr for pumping four <br />months each yeaG This cost estimate is based on development of ground water from aquifers <br />below 2500 feet, having transmissivities averaging 10,000 gallons per day per foot (gpd!ft). <br /> <br />,. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.