WSP05270 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

o o r' ,;:. ..... 0;) . . and thus serve as components of reasonable and prudent alternatives to avoid jeopardy, the Service has identified other reasonable and prudent alternatives for implementation by project sponsors to complete consultation. Following the seven-year research period, the Biology Committee will identifY and prioritize all foreseeable actions scientifically determined to be necessary to achieve recovery of the endangered fish and their habitat in the San Juan Basin, including projects requiring capital construction funds. The Coordination Committee will review the recommendations of the Biology Committee and adopt a modified long range plan, incorporating capital and research projects as appropriate. The long range plan, as amended and updated annually, will be the basis for making funding requests for the Recovery Program, and formulating annual budgets. The revised long range plan will be modified annually by the Coordination Committee as needed to reflect research results and any additional actions needed to achieve recovery. Additionally, amendments to the long range plan will be made to reflect available funding and changes in priorities for implementation. 5.0 SECTION 7 CONSULTATIONS 1. For the purposes of the RIP and Section 7 consultations, it is assumed that (1) the RIP will produce a list of actions that can be implemented to recover the species (2) the funding will be available to implement the long range plan, (3) participants will take appropriate steps to implement those actions; and (4) actions will be implemented in accordance with the schedule in the Long Range Plan (L.P.), as periodically amended. 2. Activities and accomplishments under the RIP are intended to provide the reasonable and prudent alternatives which allow water management and development activities by existing and future water projects to avoid the likelihood of jeopardy, to avoid adverse modification of critical habitat, and to minimize take of endangered species (hereinafter the "reasonable and prudent alternative'') resulting from all existing or past impacts related to existing water projects, including non-depletion impacts, and all impacts of new water projects. 3. The Service will assess the impacts of projects that require Section 7 consultation and determine if actions completed by the RIP have been sufficient for the RIP to serve as a reasonable and prudent alternative. The Service will also consider whether the probable success of the RIP is compromised as a result of a specific depletion or the cumulative effect of depletions. The Service will consider RIP actions throughout the basin in evaluating the sufficiency of those actions to serve as the reasonable and prudent alternative. The Service will make its assessment based on the best available biological data and professional judgement. The Service will assess the sufficiency of RIP actions in proportion to the potential jeopardy impacts of a proposed federal action. That is, the smaller the impact of a federal action, the lower the level of actions by the RIP needed to provide the reasonable and prudent alternative. Actions which will be considered as contributing significantly to recovery of the silvery minnow include: o provision of water for the benefit of listed fISh;