Laserfiche WebLink
<br />23 <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />(\ '..11 ,a (.'11 <br />v"..iA3t,JI. <br /> <br />The following is quoted from page 7 thereof: <br /> <br />" General <br /> <br />liThe tentative agreement existing between the states <br />of Colorado and Kansas with respect to the operation of the <br />CaddpaReservoir, provides essentially for the recognition <br />of 52,000 acre-feet of water at the State Line during the <br />April to October poriod, for use by the state of Kansas; <br />25,000 acre-feet at the State Line during the period November <br />to March, inclusive, for the Use of the state of Kansas; and <br />160,000 aore-feet of annl1al direct flow diversions by the <br />Colorado c ana.ls below the site of the reservoir to ~represent <br />status quo conditions. <br />liThe agreement provides essentially that after these <br />amounts are delivered, all water over and above them made <br />usable by the Caddoa reservoir shall be divided equally between <br />the two states for use by their respective water users. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />liThe agreement provides also that the reservoir can be <br />used by either state for regulating and making more seasonable <br />the water now being used by each state, but it does not indicate <br />the maximum amount of the capacity of the reservoir that either <br />state can use for this purpose. The above principles were taken <br />into consideratiln in the present study of the operation of the <br />Caddoa reservoir. II <br /> <br />The study shows that for the period 1914 to 1936, the <br /> <br />Caddoa Reservoir would have made available to the States of Colorado <br /> <br />and Kansas an average annual amount of l12,000 acre-feet of flood <br /> <br />water not otherwise usable. During the same period, spill would <br /> <br />have amounted to l,OOO,OOO acre-feet, or 43,000 acre-feet annually. <br /> <br />It occurred, however, in only 4 years of the 23-year period. <br /> <br />It is hoped by local and state interests that the construc- <br /> <br />tion of Caddoa Dam and agreements expected to be made by Kansas <br /> <br />and Colorado interests, with respect to the utilization of conserved <br /> <br />waters, will go far toward clarifying the use of Arkansas Basin water <br /> <br />in .Colorado and Kansas, but to predict the benefits of the Caddoa <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />:. <br />