Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />May 7, 200 I, following the Basin States' meeting, among the principals from the Lower Basin States <br />to discuss the status of the pilot projects and the trip to Washington, D.C. <br /> <br />'.., <br /> <br />At the April 26, 2001 meeting of the LCR MSCP Steering Committee, the U.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service (USFWS) distributed a revised version of its "string-of-pearls" docwnent The <br />string-of-pearls concept proposes a habitat restoration and management prescription along the Lower <br />Colorado River corridor which consists of a series of large blocks of habitat ("pearls"), that are <br />connected by linear, more narrow. corridors (the "string"). The document was largely prepared by <br />the USFWS Lower Colorado River Ecoregion Team and staff from the USFWS Arizona Ecological <br />Services Office in Phoenix, Arizona. Currently, members of the Steering Committee are reviewing <br />the revised document and coordinating with the USFWS on the appropriate course of action for <br />consideration in development of the MSCP. A copy of the revised document has been included in <br />the Board folder for your information. <br /> <br />I also prepared detailed comments on the USFWS' big river fishes recovery goals documents <br />which have been circulated, as preliminary drafts, among the Basin states representatives of the <br />Colorado River. As has been discussed at previous Board meetings, there is significant concern <br />surrounding the specific draft recovery goals among members of the Basin States' wildlife resources <br />agencies and water and power stakeholders basinwide, In fact, the State of Colorado, through the <br />Governor's and Attorney General's offices, has requested that the publication of the draft documents <br />be delayed until additional dialog has occurred between the states and USFWS. I have included a <br />copy of the Board's comment letter in your folder for your information. <br /> <br />Basin states' representatives met, via telephone conference call, on April 27 ,200 \ to discuss <br />the current status of the Defenders of Wildlife, et al. v. Norton. et al. lawsuit. Representatives of the <br />Departments of Justice and Interior also participated in the conference call. The government briefed <br />the states on the proposed contents of its motion for summary judgement Briefs are due in May and <br />June 200\. <br /> <br />Status of California Fully Protected Species Efforts <br /> <br />On April 24, 200 I. Messrs. Harris and Worthley attended an Assembly Hearing on the Fully <br />Protected Species issue and the three bills currently before the California Legislature. The California <br />Department of Fish and Game prepared an overview of the current status of each of the fully <br />protected species, and provided several case studies which illustrated the problems associated with <br />management of these species. One of the case studies included a description of the management <br />issues associated with the Lower Colorado River and the razorback sucker. Assemblyman Kelley <br />provided an excellent overview of the importance of the proposed legislation in the context of the <br />development of California's Colorado River Water Use Plan and the MSCP. Mr. Jeffrey Kightlinger, <br />Deputy General Counsel for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California also prepared <br />testimony on behalf of the Colorado River water users. <br /> <br />Assemblyman Florez indicated that additional hearings would be held in the near future. Also, <br />Assemblyman Florez' fully protected species working group is scheduled to meet again later in May <br />to continue its attempt to craft consensus legislation among all of the interested stakeholders. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />',' <br />