My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05262
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05262
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:35 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:56:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8146.400
Description
Pueblo Dam - Reports
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
5/1/1972
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Final Environmental Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3000 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2. Enlargement of Twin Lakes Reservoir <br /> <br />The alternative of enlarging Twin Lakes, an impoundment located <br />150 milee northwest of the City of Pueblo, would partially meet <br />the purposes served by Pueblo Dam and Reservoir. Twin Lakes <br />could be enlarged to store and regulate irrigation and munici- <br />pal vater; however, the regulation of municipal and industrial <br />water to meet peak demands would be difficult. Principal needs <br />not satiefied by this alternative include (1) flood control <br />and reduction of sediment on the Arkansas River, (2) storage <br />of winter flows, and (3) ws.ter-or1ented recreation, hunting and <br />fishing needs of southeastern Colorado residents. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Enlargement of Twin Lakes would require acquisition of addi- <br />tional land, extensive vegetation clearing, relocation of the <br />town of Twin Lakes, relocation of State Highws.y No. 82 and <br />various utilities, and construction of a dam spillway and out- <br />let works. Construction of protective works would be required <br />on Lake Creek and the Arkansas River downstream from Twin Lakes <br />Reservoir to contain high summer flows. These high flows are <br />required to meet irrigation and municipal and industrial demands <br />in the Arkansas Valley. There would be a greater range of ver- <br />tical fluctuation of the Twin Lakes water level, and a reduced <br />head available for ~~. Elbert Pumped-Storage Powerplant, a <br />major Fryingpan-Arkansas Project power feature to be constructed <br />on the north shore of Twin Lakes. These fluctuations would <br />result in major changes in Twin Lakes Reservoir aquatic eco- <br />system, some of which would be adverse. <br /> <br />There would be irregular flows in the Arkansas River. The <br />heeviest periodic flows would be in a 100-mile reach of the <br />river below Twin Lakes Reservoir which could disrupt the river's <br />fishery and ecosystem. <br /> <br />3. Dam and Reservoir at another Site <br /> <br />Numerous dam sites exist on the Arkansas River above the City <br />of Pueblo. The proposed site, six miles west of Pueblo, ws.s <br />selected because optimum benefits could be derived from the <br />multipurpose functions, many of which were not obtainable at <br />sites upstream. <br /> <br />Three of the potential damsites are located 5 - 13 miles west <br />of Pueblo in an area similar to vegetation and topography to <br />the proposed site. Geologic conditions had considerable bearing <br />upon the proposed location of the dam. These sites would require <br />equivalent clearing and relocation of utilities, roads, and <br />principally the main line of the Denver and Rio Grande Western <br />Railroad. These sites would have environmental impacts similar <br />to the Pueblo site. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.