My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05236
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05236
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:55:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.106
Description
Animas-La Plata
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
2/26/1996
Title
Final Biological Opinion - 1996
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Biological Opinion
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3 <br /> <br />initial depletion' of 57,100 acre-feet, (2) 7 years of research to determine <br />endangered fish habitat needs, (3) operation of the Navajo Dam to provide a <br />wide range of flow conditions for the endangered fish, (4) a guarantee that <br />the Navajo Reservoir will be operated for the life of the Project to mimic a <br />natural hydrograph based on the research, and (5) legal protection for the <br />reservoir releases to and through the endangered fish habitat to Lake Powell <br />and a commitment to develop and implement a Recovery Implementation Program <br />for the San Juan River. <br /> <br />The 1991 opinion also concluded that the project was not likely to jeopardize <br />the continued existence of the bald eagle. Development and implementation of <br />a Bald Eagle Management Plan was included as a conservation recommendation. <br /> <br />As a result of the reasonable and prudent alternative in the 1991 biological <br />opinion, the San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program (San Juan <br />RIP) was formulated in 1992. <br /> <br />During informal consultation the Service determined that no threatened or <br />endangered plant species would be impacted by the project. Also, after <br />surveys were conducted, the Service concurred with Reclamation's no affect <br />determination for the Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidental is lucida). <br /> <br />BIOLOGICAL OPINION <br /> <br />Based upon the best scientific and commercial information currently available, <br />it is the Service's biological opinion that the Project, as described below, <br />is likely to jeopardize Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker and adversely <br />modify or destroy their critical habitat by reducing prespawning and nursery <br />habitats and increasing the concentrations of contaminants in the aquatic <br />habitat of the San Juan River. The San Juan RIP is designed to act, if <br />sufficient progress toward recovery is determined by the Service, as a <br />reasonable and prudent alternative to actions within the basin that are found <br />likely to jeopardize the continued existence of listed aquatic species or <br />result in the adverse modification or destruction of critical habitat in the <br />basin. The Service has determined that sufficient progress has not yet been <br />achieved to avoid jeopardy or adverse modification to critical habitat of <br />Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker for a depletion of 149,220 acre-feet. <br />Therefore, the Service has developed reasonable and prudent alternatives to <br />avoid the likelihood of jeopardy and adverse modification of critical habitat. <br /> <br />It is the Service's biological opinion that the Project, as described herein, <br />is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the bald eagle. <br />Implementation of the conservation recommendations will aid in the <br />conservation of the species. <br /> <br />Reclamation has agreed with the Service's opinion that the Project is likely <br />to jeopardize Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker and adversely modify or <br /> <br />'The Service defines a depletion as the amount of water that is not <br />returned to a river system due to project implementation, i.e., the amount <br />diverted minus return flows and evaporation equals the depletion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.