Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2 <br /> <br />squawfish in the San Juan River at the mouth of McElmo Creek near Aneth, Utah, <br />it was concluded that ". . . the proposed project is likely to further degrade <br />the San Juan River to a point that this population will be lost. However, <br />because of the apparent small size of the San Juan River squawfish population <br />and its already tenuous hold on survival, its possible loss should have little <br />impact on the successfully reproducing Green and Colorado Rivers squawfish <br />populations and, therefore, the species itself." <br /> <br />A wintering population of approximately 20 bald eagles and the presence of an <br />active nest site along the Animas River led to the 1979 conclusion that <br />reductions in streamflow would neither significantly affect the food base of <br />the Animas River nor deter eagle use of the area. While a historical aerie <br />for peregrine falcons exists within the Project area, it has been unoccupied <br />since 1963, and there was no evidence of breeding activity or sightings in or <br />around the immediate Project area. In addition, the Colorado Division of <br />Wildlife determined that the surrounding hunting habitat is of marginal <br />quality (Jel"ry Craig, CDOW, pers. conm.). <br /> <br />The 1979 biological opinion found the Project was unlikely to jeopardize the <br />continued existence of any of the three species identified above; however, <br />several recommendations were made regarding Colorado squawfish and bald eagles <br />in furtherance of their conservation. It was recommended that a Bald Eagle <br />Management Plan be developed for Project reservoirs. For Colorado squawfish, <br />it was recommended that: <br /> <br />1. native fish populations of the San Juan River be thoroughly surveyed, <br /> <br />2. environmental needs of Colorado squawfish be determined, <br /> <br />3. an attempt be made to meet the above needs by adjusting projects on <br />the San Juan River drainage, and <br /> <br />4. provide and fund artificial facilities in which to spawn and rear <br />Colorado squawfish until such time that suitable habitats in the San <br />Juan River can be developed and maintained. <br /> <br />On February 6, 1990, Reclamation reinitiated section 7 consultation and <br />provided the Service with an updated biological assessment of Project impacts <br />on Colorado squawfish. On May 7, 1990, the Service issued a draft biological <br />opinion concluding that the Project would jeopardize the continued existence <br />of the Colorado squawfish. No reasonable and prudent alternatives were <br />identified at that time. Reclamation and the Service began actively seeking <br />reasonable and prudent alternatives and in a March 4, 1991, letter Reclamation <br />proposed a reasonable and prudent alternative to preclude the likelihood of <br />jeopardy from the Project. The Service issued a final biological opinion for <br />the Animas-La Plata Project on October 25, 1991, that concluded the project as <br />proposed would likely jeopardize the continued existence of the Colorado <br />squawfish and razorback sucker. The reasonable and prudent alternative in <br />that opinion included: (1) an Animas-La Plata Project that results in an <br /> <br />., <br />